136
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
136 points (94.2% liked)
Games
15867 readers
563 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It really sucks that Helldivers 2 is having an issue over too many connections. I know the devs are saying this is complicated, and it is, but they're not the only company that is serving a huge amount of users. This game has several questionable design decisions and this is just one of them. I hope it can be fixed because I was really looking forward to playing
Designing for a huge amount of users costs money and expertise, so more money, and not even their most optimistic predictions included this many players. If they hadn't made it big, that money would've been wasted. Which games are going to go viral is just insanely hard to predict.
I wonder what's the scalability issue. I've never seen a system that can't be fixed by throwing more horizontally scalable resources at it.
Given that when the servers are overloaded you don't get rewards: They probably have a centralized database or some other centralization issue.
You can add to a cluster all you want but if you're using a SQL monolith you'll get locks.
If you only have 100k concurrent users you can probably get away with it.
At 450k they're running into gridlock
Yeha, that's what I can't imagine. What part of their data architecture can't be sharded?
user accounts? sessions? cache keys? profiles? graphical assets?
This isn't a highly transactional bank with strong transactional guarantes.
Would be pretty cool if they explained the issue after fixing it.
I mean it's not a bank in that it doesn't have all the audit requirements etc but it's sorta a bank in that it's keeping track of transactions and state for every player every time a mission completes, which is a transaction that they really don't want to go wrong.
And at a guess that code is held together with spit and baling wire.
Napkin math: That centralized transactional account updates every time there's an end mission payout and with 400k concurrent players at 4 players per mission, say average 20 minute length (some missions 2 min some 40) that's thousands of transactions per minute.
Totally doable load for even a modest central server I'd think... Unless you've got optimization issues. Which I'd argue a central db that doesn't shard out at scale is an optimization issue.
Rare's Sea of Thieves has/had similar issues. They run all their game instance servers on Azure (from some deep divers looking at IPs the game communicates with) and can spin up/down as many as needed to handle as many players as needed (from some change logs a year or two ago).
That said, during times of especially high player counts like right after an update drops, there's often issues when you initially launch the game and it tries to log you in. Gold payouts can also be delayed by a number of hours, but they've got some sort of queuing system in place so you don't need to stay signed in until they show up. You can sign out and they can somehow apply while you aren't playing.
I mean letting people play their coop game if their servers are having issues is free. The game itself is P2P anyway.