wizardbeard

joined 3 years ago
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 hours ago

Fucking tease.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The deliveritems clan? How does that work?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

What? Most android devices are cheaper than paying the Apple premium.

You've got a job waiting for you with Nanotrasen's finest doctors aboard the illustrious Space Station 13!

It's a bunch of slapped together simulation systems in a trench coat, slathered in a layer of spessman slime and clown wigs, and shoved in an ancient diy MMO engine from the mid 2000s solely kept alive by this game.

More importantly, you can strap someone to an operating table in medbay, slice off their butt with a scalpel. You can then wear it as a hat.

Alternatively give it to the chef so he can cook a butt burger, or give it to the roboticist who can slap it on a talking roomba that runs around repeating what people say but switching words with "BUTT" (help changeling in BUTT!). People without butts cannot fart emote, and certain illnesses that would cause them to fart instead deal internal damage until they explode in a shower of blood and viscera.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Oh hey, it's that thing from my last therapy session that hit me like a fucking train because the therapist pointed out correctly that I never grew up feeling this, which is something I've never truly acknowledged.

Like I get it logically, but rarely have actually felt it.

Thanks for the reminder friendo.

Always one of the character ones. The others you can get at stores pretty easily. Not as a kid, but still.

It only takes a few taps to go from a meme, video, or picture you're showing someone to the browser.

Didn't have smart phones when I went to college, but I had some friends who prided themselves on how fast they could get to browser history on an "unattended" laptop, as in, I turned around to talk to someone else for ~60 seconds.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like the idea, but feel like the hotdog bun is too much bread

~~Jesse~~ BadmanDan, what the fuck are you talking about?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I enjoyed it, but so far it's no comparison to SAC. Felt a little off-balance.

It was very fast paced, especially compared to Stand Alone Complex anime(s).

A lot of the characters talk a big game, then make minor mistakes, and it feels odd. There wasn't too much that felt like they were being outsmarted by a clever enemy, they just kinda fucked up. And then the mistakes ended up not mattering at all? It messes with the characterization I'm used to seeing for these characters, and it felt odd to have the mistakes not really have any impact on anything either.

While I enjoy the animation style, it was weird to see the *-koma tanks animated like little creatures first and robot spiders second rather than "little metal spiders primarily, who are secondarily little creatures".

Overall, it feels like they're going for more action/comedy than heady cyberpunk sci-fi show. Still good and fun, just not quite what I expected.

And it's literally just the first 25 minute episode. Who knows where it'll go from here.

Have you watched many of the other takes on GiTS? There's plenty of repeated themes and scenes across the different incarnations of it.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Except all of those examples are from the Old Testament, which most Christians tend to pick and choose from, largely believing that it's effectively been wiped away by the New Testament. They treat it mostly as historical text about the lead up to Jesus's arrival, generally not as any active set of laws or rules. But it is very much a pick and choose source of hypocrisy for what different Christians consider as "still counting". Tons of examples like this to garbage person using it to justify their bullshit.

Also worth noting that the Christian Old Testament is from the same source text as the Jewish Tanakh, except that Jewish interpretations/translations are based off older material/translations closer to the original "source" text where Christian ones tend to be based off early translations into languages like Greek and Latin, and the Christian take on it reorganizes it roughly chronologically.


All this to say, most Christians see this shit as the horrid backwards ancient shit it is, and these examples are mostly present in Jewish canon as well despite the ever present edgy internet atheist brigade's hyperfixation with exclusively taking on Christianity.

Still awful, still worth calling out, but being more informed helps everyone make better criticisms.

 

cross-posted from: https://europe.pub/post/13247925

A tiny snippet of user-generated text as short as 13 words long is often enough to manipulate the AI agents that power tools like ChatGPT and Google’s AI search, new research shows. The study suggests that it is trivially easy for brands to inject promotional content on sites like Reddit, Quora, and Wikipedia with the end goal of poisoning or manipulating the output of AI tools.

The preprint research, done by Hal Triedman, Tingwei Zhang, and Vitaly Shmatikov of Cornell University, is called “Deep-research agents can be poisoned via user-generated content” and provides a mechanism and research basis for a problem that has been noticed by Reddit moderators and Wikipedia editors, namely that their websites are getting flooded with promotional content from brands trying to do AEO, or AI-engine optimization. 404 Media has repeatedly reported on this booming industry, in which brands try to promote their product by seeding the websites that AI tools most often cite and scrape from with inauthentic and spammy content.

The Cornell research finds that deep research agents, which are the real-time scrapers that tools like Google AI search and ChatGPT use to retrieve web content with citations in response to user queries, cite user-generated content from sites like Reddit or Wikipedia in roughly half of all queries, and that nearly a quarter of all citations come from user-generated websites. The paper suggests that what we have been seeing is basically Redditor suggests you put glue on your pizza as a service, or an end-to-end attack against the systems that increasingly dominate the ways that people access information online. The researchers found that “a single poisoned Reddit comment can influence generated outputs for an entire cluster of related [AI] queries,” the paper said.

“We show that a tiny snippet—just 13 words—of retrieved text on a UGC website like Reddit, Wikipedia, Quora, Facebook, etc. can change AI agents to output spam / scam content pretty consistently,” Triedman told 404 Media.

 

I'm meeting up in a few weeks with a close friend I haven't seen in around a decade, who went hard into scrum and project management in the intervening years.

How can I cause the most psychological damage and work flashbacks in a single sentence?

 
 

For when someone has been doing a bit too much navel gazing, or is a bit too in love with their own thoughts.

Cropped from: https://piefed.world/comment/4633293

63
Uphill, both ways! (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
 

Cropped from [EastCoastitNotes], shared by @stamets@lemmy.world in this post: https://lemmy.world/post/31818124

 

My daughter is a little over two, and through well meaning family and friends we have more toys than we know what to do with.

My wife keeps buying what are essentially (fancy looking) big boxes and just dumping everything in them. Love my wife, but that's not working, it's just hiding some of the mess in a box.

We end up with these hardly ever opened boxes full of unorganized piles of toys that we end up having to dig through to find anything specific, and the toys that my daughter is actively using just end up scattered around the floor so they don't disappear into the box dimension.

Every once in a while my daughter opens and digs through the boxes and dumps half the contents on the floor anyway (not like she can see specific things to grab what she wants) and then we just kind of arbitrarily choose some of it to put back in the box and a new combination of mess to leave out.

Unfortunately we have another baby on the way, so I'm probably not getting my wife to let us toss any of it right now.

I'm leaning towards cubby shelves with individual bins for different "types" of toys like her daycare does, but I wanted to hear what strategies other parents tried, and what has and hasn't worked.

 

This blog post has been reported on and distorted by a lot of tech news sites using it to wax delusional about AI's future role in vulnerability detection.

But they all gloss over the critical bit: in fairly ideal circumstances where the AI was being directed to the vuln, it had only an 8% success rate, and a whopping 28% false positive rate!

view more: next ›