634
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/div0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

I asked and enough of you answered that allowing to federate with threads.net even for the lolz would be considered too risky for y'all.

So I've gone ahead and added threads.net to our blocklist.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hikaru755@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

I’d bet Threads was never supposed to be federated.

Except they already publicly announced that Threads is going to support ActivityPub and federate with the larger fediverse.

They just made use of a pre-existing software

Not in the way you think, I believe. It's not like they used Mastodon as a basis - they can't, at least not without also making their own software open source, which is never gonna happen. No, the software they're using is proprietary and built by them. What they are "reusing" is the ActivityPub protocol, but it's not like that was a cost-saving measure. Without the goal to federate, it would make no sense at all to use ActivityPub.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
634 points (98.6% liked)

/0

1537 readers
2 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS