665
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by qaz@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 56 points 5 months ago

It's not the cables that are the issue, it's the manufacturer that don't design their products to USB C specification so they don't charge via C to C cable like it should.

[-] eyeon@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

see https://learn.adafruit.com/understanding-usb-type-c-cable-types-pitfalls-and-more/cable-types-and-differences for all the various things the cable alone can support

what devices can support is definitely an issue too though.

[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

I understand that, but I've had USB C devices for almost a decade. I only buy full featured cables so it hasn't been an issue, at least for me. Any time a device comes with a cable it goes into the trash.

[-] lemmyman@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So you see the issue and have a workaround. Good! But that doesn't mean that, as you said, "it's not the cables that are the issue." Why throw them away if they're not an issue?

[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

I don't need 36 cables that I'll never use. I have a charger and cable in my living room, kitchen, bedroom, office, basement, and car. Those cables will charge almost every electronic device I own, 8 of them currently within eyesight.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago
[-] evranch@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

But then someone else will end up with these bunk cables. They really should have demanded mandatory identification on the cable ends.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
665 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

44827 readers
2356 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS