1015
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 74 points 8 months ago

This is also implying that common everyday people actually have control or can influence the situation.

While a wealthy few in the world are the ones that can actually drive change for the better but refuse to because it would affect their wealth and power.

90% of the population wants to do something

10% of the population owns everything

The 10% who have all the control don't mind watching the world burn as long as they keep their mansion.

90% of the population can't do anything because they don't have the wealth to influence anything

100% of the world is completely fine with this situation.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 8 months ago

I think most of us are resigned to this situation.

We're not good at popular organizing. We're very good at finding ways of othering factions, which the elite are glad to utilize.

We're good at consolidating power. We're not good at utilizing that power to serve the public. Hence billionaires don't even think of charity work except as a means to preserve power.

The human species may be doomed to extinction or a cap on technological progress. We may just be tribal hunters too attached to dominance hierarchy to reach into space and colonize other worlds.

Or we may be stuck in a perpetual cycle where we just form feudal empires that poison the world for another epoch.

The solution — if there is one — is sociological. We figure out a way to diffuse political power so it can't be consolidated. We fix dominance hierarchy and tragedy of the commons. We figure out a way to teach people that everybody (even the ones that disgust us) are part of the community and deserve regard.

Until we find it, we'll continue to let elites hold all the resources and poison the earth with impunity.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The solution — if there is one — is sociological. We figure out a way to diffuse political power so it can't be consolidated

This is the final jeopardy question... We need to focus on how to shape society to be resistant to power consolidation. Otherwise any progress is temporary at best

[-] andymouse@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

From an evolutionary perspective, only the ones who survive matter.

So in that spirit, the only way to create a society resistant to power consolidations is one that actively recognizes, seeks out and annihilates said power consolidations.

As otherwise, they will annihilate everything opposing them -- as history tells us.

There are gentler social traditions to distribute wealth and power so as to avoid consolidation. Probably the post-colonial world is beyond that point.

A scary prospect, to be sure, but in the grand scheme of things.. "The secrets of evolution are time and death" as Carl Sagan said in Cosmos.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
1015 points (98.3% liked)

Solarpunk

5393 readers
33 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS