89
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 31 points 5 months ago

I noticed in the first movie they cut out most of the Muslim imagery, as well as the Fremen guy who kamikazes a ship (iirc). Guessing there's more of the same in part 2?

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 52 points 5 months ago

Nope Americans are just so deeply misinformed they miss the obvious and think all the good guys and resistance fighters are them. Movie has plenty of Arab and Berber allusions.

[-] Smeagolicious@hexbear.net 38 points 5 months ago

Second movie is much better about it, though they still refuse to use "jihad" as a term probably for burger reasons (it would send 80-90% of an american audience into a berserk state)

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 5 months ago

To be fair they don’t refrain from calling it a religious war. Though using the term “holy war” instead of jihad is most definitely to dumb it down for Americans who don’t know “jihad” is not just a term for islamic terrorism

[-] Smeagolicious@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

For sure - the message is the same and the plot isn't harmed in any measurable way, just a kinda pointless/funny concession to the American audience

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
89 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13385 readers
835 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS