96
submitted 8 months ago by tet@lemm.ee to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Which seas do you avoid?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hector@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

30% allowing to use: Steam servers, Steam Workshop, Steam Cloud, Steamworks, Steam API

All of this is free for the players and developers they got to find a way to pay for all of this.

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago

Considering that Valve makes more money per employee than most major tech companies, it definitely seems like it would still be turning a profit if its share of sales were reduced to 15 or 20 percent. Steam's services aren't free; the 30% fee inflates the price of games by 43%. As with any company Valve needs to have a high enough profit margin to cover long-term costs and R&D budgets, but the 30% cut is an outdated industry standard from when server operating costs were substantially higher than today.

[-] hector@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Well I don’t know the internal details but looking at all the benefits and services provided to the developers and players this doesn’t seem unfair.

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 months ago

Aside from hosting cloud saves and Steam workshop data, there aren't many other services that justify a high fee to offset long-term costs. Steam trading cards, for instance, are just another source of revenue for Valve given that they also take a cut of sales from marketplace transactions.

Given that Valve's costs in developing Proton are offset by the higher Steam game purchase rates of Steam Deck users (myself included), the main benefit to developers is Steam's user base. As with Apple and the iOS app store, however, having what amounts to a monopoly in a market segment is not a justification for high platform access fees.

[-] hector@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I mean… there’s Steam Workshop, Steam Voice, all the post, interactions, communities, etc.. all of this have to weight a lot on their budget.

[-] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

My guess is that R&D as well as third-party Steam keys eat into their margins.

It could be more sustainable with this higher fee as well. Valve supports old games for a long time whereas console manufacturers pull the plug 10 years later. You could argue that Microsoft takes only 12%, but Microsoft has the luxury of being able to exit the PC games market at any time, or they can take a loss on it indefinitely. Valve needs to survive off its PC store because it's the only thing they really have

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
96 points (97.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54914 readers
493 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS