this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

xkcd

12130 readers
356 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] open_world@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Oh is that how they work

[–] gregw@lemmy.gregw.us 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't that a bit backward? Compress in the cooler area, radiate heat, bring it inside and expand, absorb heat, then carry it outside.

[–] Dettweiler42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's what I was thinking. Expansion/absorption happens in the air handler in the house, while compression/radiation happens outside.

For heating, it usually just turns on an electric coil in the air handler.

[–] YerbaYerba@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago

They work in reverse too. A heat pump can heat more efficiently than a resistance heater.

[–] bradmoor@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you were trying to cool a room like with an air conditioner, yes. Heat pumps literally work in reverse, bringing heat in more efficiently than any resistive heater. They output more heat energy than they use, as they are moving heat, not generating it.

[–] gregw@lemmy.gregw.us 2 points 2 years ago

They're not only for heating though, they can cool as well.

I guess I interpreted the comic backward; they're heating the room not cooling it.