Supporters of anti-LGBTQ+ KOSA bill say they have 60 votes in the Senate (US focused) (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 9 months ago by thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/bad_internet_bills

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They've unveiled a new version, with some improvements. Fight for the Future's statement (not quoted in the Washington Post, of course, which is a mouthpiece for tech) says "we are glad to see the attorney general enforcement narrowed" but also notes that "As we have said for months, the fundamental problem with KOSA is that its duty of care covers content specific aspects of content recommendation systems, and the new changes fail to address that." So it's still a bad bill.

But just because they're claiming they have the votes in the Senate, it's not a done deal yet -- and it still has to go through the House. So, if you're in the US, call your legislators! https://www.stopkosa.com/

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024

18 points (87.5% liked)

KOSA and other Bad Internet Bills (US-specific for now)

254 readers

1 users here now

Red alert! For the last six months, EFF, Fight for the Future, ACLU, Woodhull Foundation, and dozens of other groups have been sounding the alarm about several #BadInternetBills that have been put forward in Congress. We’ve made it clear that these bills are terrible ideas, but Congress is now considering packaging them together—possibly into must-pass legislation. We're organizing to keep them from sneaking these bad internet bills through.

This community is for news stories, opinion pieces, and action links about these bad internet bills. Please help get the word out!

And if you use microblogging software like Mastodon, please also check out the #BadInternetBills hashtag.

Icon originally from Why we need to openly protest KOSA on Five Nights at Freddy's Wiki, used by permission.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

thenexusofprivacy