95
submitted 6 months ago by Asudox@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lemmchen@feddit.de 10 points 6 months ago

Wow, I think this basically makes Session obsolete.

[-] rar@discuss.online 7 points 6 months ago

SimpleX having PFS while Session not having it also seals the deal.

[-] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

agreed, i liked that session had out of the box alternative routing, but a basic vpn + simplex's new private routing knocks down one of my final gripes with the app.

although, i guess my only other gripe now is that using your simplex profile on both desktop and phone is either hard as shite or totally impossible.

[-] Lemmchen@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

using your simplex profile on both desktop and phone

Why would that be hard?

[-] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 months ago

Why is Simplex based. Damn this is cool.

However, I do wish they would adopt a more decentralized approach like Jami and Briar. It is very hard to get right but it has so many benifits.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

Yea, my main concern for now is that most people are using default servers. Good thing their servers are very easy to host, but still, power of the default. I would really like to see lists of public servers, like what we see now for XMPP and Matrix. The thing is still young, so looking forward.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago
[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago

I self-host too, that wasn't the problem, it's that there is the power of the default. Just like with Matrix. You can ask a friend to use your server or another one and delete the main ones entirely, but chances are you won't be avoiding them in a random chatroom.

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Any libre software with voice chat more decentralised than this?

[-] refalo@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago
[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago

I wonder what would happen if you host a server but block the domains of the central ones, asking everyone you chat with to use other servers instead.

[-] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

You don't think that XMPP clients are better, like conversations or others?

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

XMPP as a protocol was great. But the problems the servers had, the mess is just a no go. SimpleX is far better in privacy and usability in my opinion. I doubt XMPP will recover anytime soon.

[-] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

And with its own server?

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 3 points 6 months ago

Most important part of the blog post:

We are planning a 3rd party security audit for the protocols and cryptography design in July 2024, and also the security audit for an implementation in December 2024/January 2025, and it would hugely help us if some part of this $50,000+ expense is covered with donations.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
95 points (97.0% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
365 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS