1947

It's not just Adobe. Now Logitech wants me to go to a random website in order to add peripherals to my computer, and I'm met with this when I go to the page they tell me to (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by JGrffn@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

334 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As if it wasn't bad enough that they want me to use a random internet service to add a keyboard to a usb wifi receiver, they have the balls to put this for Firefox users. I clicked out of pure curiosity, as I'm not even remotely interested in involving a corporate internet service in getting my keyboard connected to my computer. This is the message you get now on Logi Options software if you have a Unifying Receiver:

For the curious: https://logiwebconnect.com

EDIT: some people on the thread have brought up that the error message being displayed for Firefox users is due to the WebUSB API not being implemented by Firefox due to security concerns. This still does not justify having to use a web app to plug peripherals to a PC.

(page 5) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] DrZoidberg@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I just use Redragon stuff. It just plugs in and works. Only time you need the software is if you wanna remap buttons or change the colors.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's not a strict useragnent filter, they're displaying this for all browsers that don't have the web usb api
firefox does not support it yet (support is planned afaik)

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

wtf

[-] jontix@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 year ago

I believe it is a trend in Chinese tech companies.

[-] royal_starfish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Which is why I use my mouse in onboard mode after setting it up with someone else's computer

[-] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 1 year ago

This might be new. I've been using Firefox for years and have a couple of Logitech unified receiver devices. I don't remember chrome being involved. That would've pissed me off too.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Trying to figure out my next move when my harmony hubs become a pain or stop working altogether.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There aren't any great alternatives yet (maybe ever) but Sofabaton U2 and the Skip 1S seem to be the current most popular replacements.

You will lose some functionality, unfortunately there's nothing to be done for it but wait and support the companies trying to go in the right direction.

Personally I like the Skip 1S haven't tried Sofabaton.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Harmonys have required the internet since forever, which i get because the device database is constantly updating. I wouldn't worry about longevity though - we still use a 525 (the one from before they started limiting how many devices per remote)

[-] spirit_kun@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the info

[-] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

That's so frustrating and stupid. When I bought my latest mouse I went with a Zowie specifically because you can change the relevant DPI/polling rate functions with a button right underneath the mouse. It's simple. It doesn't require a proprietary third party application or website on my computer. And usually those things don't even work with Linux, not that I would want them in any OS.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023

1947 points (98.9% liked)

Firefox

18006 readers

29 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml