19
submitted 1 month ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/movies@lemm.ee

Ridley Scott's “Napoleon: The Director's Cut” is potentially coming very soon. It's just been rated R for strong violence, grisly images, sexual content, some nudity and language. This signifies clear intent on the part of Apple TV to make it available on their platform.

In late August 2023, we had broken the news that Scott was working on a director’s cut of “Napoleon” and that it would clock in at over 4 hours. It’s obviously piqued our interest since then. The theatrically released version had some narrative holes in it, and a director’s cut could potentially cure that.

Scott later told Total Film that it would be made available after the film’s November release. He called his lengthier cut “Fantastic” … Well, we’re still waiting, Ridley.

One person who much prefers the theatrically released version of “Napoleon” is its writer, David Scarpa. In an IndieWire interview, Scarpa admitted that the 158-minute version we watched in theaters is the “better,” “tighter” and “concise” version

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] scytale@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Has there ever been a movie where the director’s cut was shorter than the theatrical cut?

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

Quite a few. The most famous is the Donner Cut of Superman II as he was replaced before they finished making the film, so that is his demonstration of what his version would have been like, which happened to be shorter.

As we're talking about Scott he did a cut of Alien for the DVD boxset that is a minute shorter, but he says the theatrical cut is the definitive one. One of his cuts for Blade Runner is shorter too, I think the Final Cut.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah I remember Blade Runner, but there were so many versions I don’t know which one is the definitive cut anymore.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

Whichever you like the most. However, I think the Final Cut is the definitive one. Or perhaps the Penultimate Cut.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Yea, 4 hours is obviously quite long. But the theatrical release wasn't "tight" IMO. I personally felt the plot holes and narrative jumps very strongly and it turned me off of the film as I was watching it. Though I've only seen it once, I think it hurt the characterisation of Napoleon too. Whether a longer cut helps that, I'm not sure ... but it seems more than plausible.

My experience with long films like this is to watch them in split sessions, even on adjacent days.

I once watched Barry Lyndon in 3 split sittings on 3 separate days and really enjoyed it. It's basically like watching a short TV series.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Interesting

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
19 points (88.0% liked)

movies

1369 readers
369 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS