submitted 2 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This appears to be aimed at subsidizing the construction of a gas-burning power plant, rather than achieving a reduction in net CO2 emissions

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Britain says a lot of shit.

The fact they are suggesting this is down to Northerners is a new low.

What's that, man in Burnley? BP can offset their horrific environmental track record by exporting their harm to the bottom of the sea?

Sure, that's a great Idea and we love your ferret and whippet.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

I believe it's about shoveling money to the oil companies and providing a bit of cover for building a new gas-burning power plant

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024

5 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

607 readers

63 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS