776

Tony's Chocolonely bars are shaped unevenly to represent farmer inequality and the coastline of Africa (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by Pencilnoob@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

186 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"It doesn’t make sense for chocolate bars to be divided into equal-sized chunks when there is so much inequality in the chocolate industry! The unequally-sized chunks of our 6.35 oz bars are a palatable way of reminding Choco Fans and Serious Friends that the profits in the chocolate industry are unequally divided.

And in case you haven’t noticed, the bottom of our bars depicts the West African coastline. The chunks just above it represent the Gulf of Guinea. From left to right, you have Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Togo and Benin (terribly politically incorrect, we know, but we had to combine them to create enough space for a hazelnut), Nigeria and part of Cameroon."

From https://us.tonyschocolonely.com/pages/faqs

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The billionaire chocolate bar would leave only the wrapping paper to the consumer.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Am I the only one that thinks its ridiculous to eat an ounce of chocolate a day?

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

you're right, you need at least 7 a day to keep diabetes at bay!

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] AceQuorthon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

I want to like this chocolate, but it's just so bland.

[-] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

I think it’s delicious.

Are you American as I find your chocolate far too sweet so perhaps you just like sugar and not chocolate.

I realise that might sound offensive but I don’t mean it that way, just curious.

load more comments (6 replies)

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I see Saddam Hussein in the bottom left there. The meme know no bounds!

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

I'm gonna be real here when I saw one of these bars for the first time I just assumed they were assholes and didn't look any further into why the bar wasn't cut in a usable way.

[-] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

It literally tells you why inside the packaging.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Absolutely disgusting chocolate in my opinion. Chalky and bland. It’s nice that they claim to be about equality, but the product itself just isn’t to my taste. And yes, the dumb way they make these bars also really puts me off.

I just want a normal, boring bar that tastes nice. And this is not the brand for me.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Teal@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unless something has changed that company is no longer on the slavery free list due to them having Callebaut making their chocolate.

https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2021/02/16/Tony-s-Chocolonely-axed-from-Slave-Free-Chocolate-list-defends-ties-with-Barry-Callebaut)

Guittard is my favorite for snacking and using in baking.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024

776 points (90.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17350 readers

403 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

Terevos@lemm.ee