196
News on Naomi Wu ('s) – New Product Nukit – 222nm UV sterilizer – cutting edge, safe for active use with humans present tech – Big Clive YT 🌈 (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by j4k3@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4a_kJkVUis

Big Clive's video description:

This is not a sponsored video.  I feel it's important that people should know about this evolving technology, and Naomi is working on making it affordable.

During the pandemic YouTuber Naomi Wu presented plans for traditional mercury vapour based UVC sterilising lights with a special housing, to sterilise air in a room without exposing the occupants to the 254nm UVC light.

With the evolution and availability of the new era 222nm excimer lamps, Naomi has gone on to design a full product designed to be easy and convenient to deploy in populated areas like medical practices, waiting rooms, retail environments, food preparation areas and live events.

The special feature of the 222nm wavelength is that it is long enough to deactivate viral and bacterial air contaminants, but short enough not to pass through the outer layer of dead skin or the tear-layer of humans.  That means that it is currently considered safe to use in occupied areas.

The filter on the front of the light seems to specifically pass 222nm.  Without it there is a very slight hump in the spectral output at around 237nm.  The filter attenuates that completely.

Excimer is an abbreviation of Excited-Dimer, where a dimer is the joining of two molecules.  In the case of the excimer lamps the molecules are encouraged to bond temporarily in a plasma discharge, and when they revert back to their non-excited state they emit a photon of light at a specific wavelength determined by the chemistry.  In this case it's molecules of Krypton and Chlorine that form brief molecules of Krypton-Chloride (KrCl), before reverting back and emitting 222nm photons in the process.

The process of creating the plasma is very similar to dielectric barrier ozone generators.  By coupling to the gasses capacitively the lamp also avoids contaminating the gasses with the electrode materials.

Note that the unit uses 500mA at 12V (6W) but has a generously rated 12W power supply that runs cool.

This technology looks like it may be valuable in medical, care, travel or social environments to limit the spread of pathogens.

Here's a link to Naomi's pleasingly-named online shop:- https://cybernightmarket.com/products

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mystik@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

This is the first thing I have heard from her about what she’s working on since she had her “wings clipped”. Hope she is still doing good..

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 28 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it's a shame that she doesn't seem to be able to put herself front-and-center with this. I hope she's able to get herself and her family out.

[-] mox 18 points 2 months ago

Last time I read something from her on the topic, she seemed to like Shenzhen too much to want to get out.

That was before things took a turn in her life, though. I wonder if that has changed.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Her partner is Uyghur. She said that she can get out but the other girl can't. I hope they're both doing well.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago

i use UVC lamps and based on experience my main concern would be Ozone. Even if Naomi solved the problem of light exposure, she can't do anything about the ozone production.

Don't use UVC lamps in "waiting rooms, retail environments, food preparation areas and live events" unless the windows are open. And if you can open windows, then you don't need to clean the air with a UVC lamp.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

In the video Clive says he didn't smell any and explains it is likely due to the design of the electrodes. I do not claim to know much, but I have some high end refrigerator UV bulbs that both do and don't produce O^3^ in a near identical package to each other. I'm not sure about the tech behind it. I got both, O^3^ for sterilization and the regular for photolithography.

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago

Didn't smell any is certainly not a good way to measure this. I mean, I am no expert, but surely there is something that can actually put a number to the amount produced.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It is very noticeable if any is produced. You'll smell it quite easily. It isn't a big deal. There is a bunch of ozone after any lightning storm in an area, and while most is in the upper atmosphere, any direct sunlight outside is producing some too.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

Chronic ozone exposure is a big deal.

https://www.lung.org/clean-air/outdoors/what-makes-air-unhealthy/ozone

Ozone reacts with various molecules in the lung to produce free radicals, highly reactive species of atoms/molecules that cause tissue damage.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0891584994901724

On the bright side, you're right about being able to smell it. The permissible exposure limit in the United States is 0.1 ppm (over eight hours) but the concentration most people can detect ranges from 0.01-0.05 ppm.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I'm not saying it is no big deal to regularly expose one's self to it.

I know about how small of an amount can be smelled from building a power supply for a UV light, making mistakes, and yet still smelling the thing. It was back driving some circuit block that shouldn't have been enough power to do anything, there was no visible effect, but I could still smell the faint smell of O^3^. Even with a tiny bulb, the smell is nearly instantaneous when the light is powered. Running one around anything that can rust is a bad idea. It is almost as bad as working with hydrochloric acid and hydrogen peroxide as enchants; everything goes super rusty fast. I don't get exposed to it regularly, so I'm not worried. Most hotel rooms smell pretty strongly of O^3^ in the many I have stayed in and that is probably the most that the average person gets exposed for any extended length of time. The alternative is probably worse, but still people don't worry about that one too much.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

Sorry, late night me brain forgot to provide the context for my comment! My concern would be occupational usage if it does produce any ozone, especially in the small business sector, which often doesn't use as much caution around chemical exposure as one might want.

It might also be a non-issue. I have half a mind to build one of these and do some testing.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That was my question. What is the exhaust of this in action?

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

wavelength is that it is long enough to deactivate viral and bacterial air contaminants, but short enough not to pass through the outer layer of dead skin or the tear-layer of humans.

What about the eyes? As a welder the first thing I think of is getting Welder's Flash.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Welding is much much higher power than this 6w lamp. I bridge both spaces. I did my LA structural steel cert out of Local 12 many years ago.

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 5 points 2 months ago

Most of the power in welding doesn't go into UV generation, but this lamp is all about the radiation. I'd like to see a comparison of their respective UV outputs to be sure.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It is 6w before power supply losses and then a tube that is likely under 20% efficient. The primary thing that gets you with welding is the fraction of a second before an auto darkening lens activates. It is a tiny amount of time, but it adds up. Or all those times you accidentally touch the tungsten to the pool with tig. Welding has a wide spectrum, but it is the power that matters most here. The frequency and power are two separate and unrelated things. Like your microwave and WiFi are both 2.4 GHz machines. Your WiFi in your home router is limited to 100 milliwatts and is totally harmless. Your microwave needs a Faraday cage built in to avoid cooking you from the inside out because it is likely around 1500 watts. At 220nm the frequency doesn't pass through skin or eye fluid and the power output of the light is low. Seriously, try getting into things like telescope filters where you're trying to isolate certain frequencies. It is challenging at these frequencies to find anything that is transparent. Of all of my science books, my optics handbook is by far the largest and hardest for me to follow. That isn't saying much, but I have built my own telescope electronics and eyepieces, along with hobby electronics, designing and etching circuit boards and photolithography using various UV lights I have built. Six watts is nothing major. I would be more concerned about how limited of an area one light can cover.

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 2 points 2 months ago

A 6W laser could easily damage the retina.

I'm not interested in rhetorical arguments guessing 'it should be fine'. I want a radiation output comparison between this lamp and other common avenues of UV exposure (sunlight, welding, tanning beds, etc...), or the creators/relevant 3rd party safety board flat out declare the possibility of eye damage was considered/tested and ruled out.

As it stands now, the article conspicuously avoids mentioning eyes to talk about how safe the skin is and that makes me wary.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That information is mentioned in the video. It is out there if you were to look instead of arguing on a rhetorical forum with a user that has nothing to do with the product or any vested interest in this whatsoever and simply tried to share something to be positive and invest their time in the community here. Interactions like this are why people tend to regret their efforts and post and interact less, or at least that is the impact such interactions have on me. You really need better self awareness here.

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That information is mentioned in the video

Could have said that in your first reply instead of arguing. But you know... I'm the one that needs better self-awareness.

Also, despite being 'safe' there are still "regulatory dosage limits" that apply (and this device seemingly does comply with).

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That is the tear-layer, isn't it?

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That particular very narrow frequency is supposed to be safe. Research is always ongoing, but the current consensus looks good.

Also you have to make sure the output is narrow band enough (which big Clive does).

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

Thanks for sharing this. One of my biggest 'pet peeves' is the cost of air filters, and the cost of replacement filters. The Nukit Tempest looks like an excellent option. And in combination with Nukit Lanterns or Torches looks like a superior alternative.

[-] baggins@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Aw I would buy one right now but she's not selling them to Canada.

[-] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Dope. Thanks!

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
196 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

60016 readers
2777 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world