-80
Coincidence? (lemmy.world)
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vzq@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

There’s a correlation between states that elect republicans and states that enact legislation that corresponds to republican legislative priorities?

INCONCEIVABLE!

[-] DarkShaggy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Yeah not sure the poster is going to be able to keep up with logic ...

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Voter manipulation is a Republican priority??

Inconceivable!!

Incase you know, not all poor people have valid ID so it eliminates them from voting. Therefore manipulating the vote

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Now what about the states where Trump won? This graphic is clearly meant to influence the viewer into making a radical conclusion based on incomplete data, whether it is true or not. I can't tell you whether there actually is a correlation because I'm too lazy to check.

Regardless I do happen to know that Trump won in at least one state where voters are not required to show ID. Which is also incomplete data so again before you draw any conclusions I recommend that you to look at the full picture.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Holy shit, they can't even just take a win.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago
[-] grumpo_potamus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The theme looks like states I'd visit vs states to actively avoid.

[-] Angrywaffle2@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

It sure does seem interesting. I really wish ids could be required by federal law.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

I don't understand why this is a contentious issue. You're required as an adult to have ID on you when you're out in public. You have to show ID to buy cigarettes, or beer, or a car, or a gun, why wouldn't you show ID when you vote? It's not like it's hard, since you'll have it on you already. Granted, mail-in ballots are a way better system anyways, so they shouldn't even be doing in-person voting, but what's the argument against IDs?

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You're required as an adult to have ID on you when you're out in public

That is not accurate.

The argument is that voting is your right, and anything that adds friction is inherently biased. Sometimes, things seem like common sense but are only brought up because it would disproportionately affect certain segments of the population.

Your love for mail in voting is actually an example of making voting more accessible while increasing potential for fraud.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
-80 points (7.4% liked)

conservative

967 readers
2 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS