71
submitted 3 weeks ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

United States v. Skrmetti is not distinct from these fights over reproductive rights — it’s their next phase. Before 2020, there was not a single law that banned access to gender-affirming care for trans people. Since then, nearly 36 states have attempted to restrict trans rights. This is not a coincidence. Recognizing the conservative turn of the courts, the Alliance Defending Freedom has drafted and promoted bills that restrict access to gender-affirming care. These model bills have been introduced in various state legislatures, contributing to a coordinated and successful strategy to limit transgender healthcare. These laws “are the result of an openly political effort to wage war on a marginalized group and our most fundamental freedoms,” writes Chase Strangio, Co-Director of the ACLU's LGBT & HIV Project.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dumples@midwest.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

I think we should all be scared about these ruling since the supreme court has rules that you don't have control over your own body. All of these rights are based on that foundation. Fundamentally and historically Christianity has placed very little value on the human body since it temporary while the human soul is not. This has lead to many atrocities to human beings since a saved soul is worth it in the end. This mean your body does not belong to you but rather to God and therefore his people on earth. Your body Their Choice.

[-] tardigrada@beehaw.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

The Fight for Trans Rights and Abortion Are Inextricably Linked.

Maybe Missouri is another good example for that. One month after Missouri voters approved a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to abortion, Republican lawmakers in the deeply red state are already working to overturn it -- (archived link) — or at least undermine it.

But it's not only that, it's also the way they try to bend the voters' will:

One measure would ask voters to amend the state constitution to define life as beginning at conception, declaring that embryos are people with rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

The result would be to classify abortion as an unlawful killing.

Another proposal, aimed at repealing the abortion rights amendment, would ask voters to ban gender transition procedures for minors, tying the two issues together, despite the fact that the amendment did not address gender surgery and gender-affirming care for transgender children is already illegal in Missouri.

Other proposed amendments include stricter abortion limits, such as restricting access to cases of rape, incest, medical emergencies and fetal anomalies. These measures would impose additional requirements, such as mandating that rape survivors file police reports to obtain an abortion.

GOP lawmakers have also introduced a measure to raise the threshold for amending the state constitution through voter initiatives, which could make it harder to pass similar measures in the future.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6210 readers
34 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS