11
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago

I've never heard of anyone taking a commercial flight for fun. What strange way to frame this article.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The wording of the headline is odd, but the article discusses flying for leisure - going on vacation, etc. - not flying as a recreational activity unto itself. The article doesn’t really discuss whether flying is fun or not, as its primary focus is on the environmental impact of passenger jets. The author has cut down the amount they fly, and defers to taking rail instead whenever possible.

The use of the word “fun“ in the title is likely meant to contrast between flying for work purposes.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago

I know what's in the article, hence why I commented what i did.

[-] zante@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago

Zantes theory of PhDs strikes again.

this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
11 points (86.7% liked)

New York Times gift articles

610 readers
311 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS