this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
781 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1618 readers
263 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 17 points 1 month ago

So people are really believing Altman would publish these damning statements without ulterior motives? Are we seriously this gullible? Holy shit, we reached a critical mass of acephalous humans, no turning back now.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

$200 a month for a user is losing money? There's no way he's just including model queries. An entire a6000 server is around $800 / month and you can fit a hell of lot more than 4 peoples worth of queries. He has to include training and or R&D.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm honestly fairly surprised as well, but at the same time, they're not serving a model that can run on an A6000, and the people paying for unlimited, would probably be the ones who setup bots and apps doing thousands of requests per hour.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wonder what their financials are actually, usually with cloud capital ventures like these they usually still magically keep raking it in even though they're "losing money".

For instance, Amazon during the pandemic paid zero corporate tax even though they had record sales because they "didn't make any profit", Tesla too who didn't make profit during 2020 yet their share price went 10x and they had plenty of shares to sell if they wanted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jackie_meaiii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago

When has "not profitable" ever stopped a tech startup lmao

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›