this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
101 points (97.2% liked)

Global News

3014 readers
435 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via AI model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President Joe Biden used his farewell address to the nation to deliver stark warnings about an “oligarchy” of ultra-wealthy individuals and a “tech-industrial complex” that infringes on Americans’ rights and threatens the future of democracy in the nation.

Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20250116073204/https://www.euronews.com/2025/01/16/biden-warns-of-ultra-wealthy-oligarchy-threatening-us-democracy-in-farewell-address-to-the

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.euronews.com%2F2025%2F01%2F16%2Fbiden-warns-of-ultra-wealthy-oligarchy-threatening-us-democracy-in-farewell-address-to-the

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 82 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The whole speech was here's everything I was aware of but didn't address

[–] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 19 points 2 weeks ago

Well, you see, it was only a problem for him when it turned against him. When he actively supported it his entire career it was the obvious and natural order of things

[–] murmelade@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago

"Here's all the cool stuff we politicians can do. Suck it. Bye!"

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

This was Biden announcing to his rich donors that he followed through on his promise that "nothing will fundamentally change"

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If Biden really was worried about democracy he had 6 months of Roberts approved blanket immunity to actually do something about it.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can’t burn those sweet appearance fee bridges that await him by ruffling too many people the wrong way.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He's only got a couple of years left, he could just live off an advance on a memoir if he was broke (which he isn't).

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

He supported the rich because he is one of them, not because he is being extorted.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago

Yep go Luigi on all those CEOs with that immunity.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Shame he didn't do anything about it while he had the chance. What is it with us presidents and doing nothing about the important issues, and only bringing them up on their last day.

[–] UID_Zero@infosec.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you fix a problem, you can't campaign on it.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like the Big Pharma strategy

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty much all of capitalism really.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Just a heavily self propagandized corporate dictatorship, doing corporate dictatorship things, because it's a corporate dictatorship.

No politician can topple the power of hundreds of corporations, and the armies they employ, backed by trillions of dollars in capital... no matter how hard they want to, even if they wanted to. All they can do is virtue signal.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 26 points 2 weeks ago

"And I did nothing about it. Worse, I helped get more into office!"

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Politicians making statements like this after they're out of power is just proof that they understand exactly what the fuck they're doing the whole fucking time they're in office.

Biden deserves to be put in the worst nursing home in the country.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, they’re the ones that bought him. They paid for his campaign, etc.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yet when I'm asking Lemmy when are they gonna start voting independent, the answer is always "not now".

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We didn't listen to Eisenhower; I don't think we're going to listen to Biden.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Eisenhower, like Biden, actually helped create the problem.

Biden could have, and should have, gone hard against Trump and his fellow insurrectionists.

Instead he chose to appoint Merrick Garland, a man whose legacy was turning a blind eye to Timothy McVeigh's accomplices in the wider Militia Movement.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe that means the US has never been a democracy at all... three-heads-thinking

[–] ExtremeDullard 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not to nitpick, but it has never been a true democracy and was never intended to be one. It's technically a democratic republic.

At least nominally: it's been a plutocracy and a gerontocracy for a long time, and it's about to become a broligarchy.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're literally just repeating my sarcasm back at me like nerd

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure but it maybe helps others to understand your sarcasm 🤗

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I would hope the emoji made it clear that "us has never been a democracy" paired with Marx Engels and Lenin would get the gears turning for some people, and anyone that already read any of that would understand the point.

People are free to ask questions but unfamiliar users from other instances outside of hexbear and lemmygrad and slightly less so lemmy.ml are rightfully treated with suspicion.

Also their comment was indistinguishable from common right wing talking points about US and democracy.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

😮 their post is right wing? I see me as left wingy and seem to agree with the person that answered your comment, thinking you two were talking about the same thing?

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's technically a democratic republic.

This is a common right wing talking point and their comment really added nothing that I hadn't already simplified with the comment they were replying to, which is a common right wing response to criticizing the US as not truly being democratic despite its claims.

"Satire demands clarity of purpose", but so do such ambiguous nitpicking. My intent was clear because I included the references to marx engels and lenin. Their comment was indeed nitpicking and that nitpicking was unclear of purpose.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not everyone is told history in the way you know history, it is not common knowledge everywhere.

I mean it should, but it isn’t

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

What a fucking joke

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, you mean the oligarchy that put Trump in the office the first time? The one that put you in the office after Trump completely fucked up the economy? The one that's been selecting both presidential candidates for the last, oh, I don't know, five decades? Six? Longer, probably? The one that's been crushing the spirit of every living person around the world with the promise of a meager subsistence life, and that's if they like you or you're convenient to their ends? And they'll throw you on the pyre of capitalism if it earns them a single cent more? That oligarchy?

Yeah, sure. Thanks for giving it the old college try, Joe.

[–] CptInsane0@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

We're all trying to find the guy who did this.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

who-did-this

Fuck off and die you racist, segregating, mass-imprisoning nazi-supporting genocidiare

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

And by his lack of action, let them in. 'Sleepy Joe' seems rather an apt moniker, although not for the Mango Mussolini's reasons.