Broligarchy Watch

1st article I tried on there was https://graymirror.substack.com/p/chevron-and-the-professional-republicans

The fundamental-error that that perspective is making, is that you CAN'T run a continent-sized-tiny-human-population ( ancient Africa ) the same way you run a 400,000,000-people, multiplied-through-technology, half-continent, like the US of A:

The no-regulations you can have on the whole-Africa-inhabited-by-few, doesn't correctly map onto 1,000x the population, in less space, with 10,000x or 100,000x the resource-consumption, through technology.

When one's ideology is dependent on ignoring that .. then .. it is impossible to respect the "integrity" ( with the falsifying-quotes on that word ) of what you're pushing.

THE DENSER THE POPULATION, & THE GREATER THE RESOURCE-CONSUMPTION OF IT, THE TIGHTER THE REGULATION HAS TO BE, TO MAKE IT SUSTAINABLE

Think of a vehicle engine:

• consumer vehicle, it never is run to its limit, so it can be neglected, & it'll still work for a reasonable-lifespan.

vs

• race-vehicle: it is ALWAYS run at it's limit, & ANY neglect quickly becomes fatal.

See?

The low-population-density of ancient Africa didn't need tight-regulation to be keeping it alive!

However, nowadays humankind's tech-multiplied costing-of-the-world-ecology is sooo-great that if we won't tightly-regulate our process, then we're reducing the number-of-generations who are allowed to live on this world, with our shortsightedness.

Sloppiness is literally slaughtering our own future-generations.

He's ignoring that, as most right-wingers do.

Notice, though, as the commuter-vs-race-engine example shows: if you want performance .. then you want your "ship" to be the tightest-run ship in the race so that ALL of its effort goes into productivity:

leave the sloppy-unregulated "competitors" in the dust, behind you, when you reach the finish-line.

This identifies that proper regulation increases the value of an economy, not reduces it.

( Brexit might be an object-lesson demonstrating this principle )

_ /\ _

This dude looks like he cups his hands around his ass when he farts so he can waft it to his face

"dense insights"

I've spent time reading and valuing a fair amount of post modernist writers. Often times, thier writings are justifiably difficult. But other times, it seems to be a byproduct a system that values obfuscation. Still, ebn in this murkiness, many of the original writers have valuable points to make. But there are a select group whose writings fail even there.

Yarvin is neither a skilled writer, a clear thinker, and often peddles in recycled conservative thought varished with corporatized vernacular who seems to never get to the point. And when does make a point, a younger me would have confused to relief of getting to a point as something worthy of the journey. Having hacked through thoughts before though, I find his destinations aren't merited by his meandering assuming he gets to a point.

Still, he has the regards of some powerful and wealthy people. However, these people are more interesting because of the positioning and not their respect for Yarvin. Yarvin provides the theory woven blanket that these people need to feel good about what they believe. Less so than Nick Land or Bronze Age Pervert, Yarvin reminds me of Jordan Peterson's rhetoric. In that sense, both are comforting to those groups confused about why the world isn't the way they think it ought to be.

Reading Yarvin is, in my opinion, no benefit in understanding the Theils and Vances of the world. Theil's political positioning, on the other hand, is worth noting, watching, and resisting.

Here’s a not-so-fun read tangential to this guy.

Strange that his personal security team hasn't been deputized.

Makes him an easy target. Shame, that.