this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
153 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

52891 readers
262 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm admittedly yelling at cloud a bit here, but I like package managers just fine. I don't want to have to have a plurality of software management tools. However, I also don't want to be caught off guard in the future if applications I rely on begin releasing exclusively with flatpak.

I don't develop distributed applications, but Im not understanding how it simplifies dependency management. Isn't it just shifting the work into the app bundle? Stuff still has to be updated or replaced all the time, right?

Don't maintainers have to release new bundles if they contain dependencies with vulnerabilities?

Is it because developers are often using dependencies that are ahead of release versions?

Also, how is it so much better than images for your applications on Docker Hub?

Never say never, I guess, but nothing about flatpak really appeals to my instincts. I really just want to know if it's something I should adopt, or if I can continue to blissfully ignore.

(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm using MX Linux AHS, it is Debian based, it is always up to date, like latest firefox a few hours after it's out, kernel 6.12.17 as of today, etc.

It has no systemd, no snap, no flatpak. It just uses the good old .deb and everything is working fine.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Glad it is working well for you. What does that have to do with this post?

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

no flatpak. chill.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Arch based distros (except for Manjaro) has every FOSS and some proprietary software on the AUR

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Let me try to clarify what you are saying.

You are saying that the AUR “has every FOSS and some proprietary software”. Yep. That is why I add an Arch Distrobox to every system regardless of the host distro.

But what do you mean by “except Manjaro”? Most Manjaro fans will say that Manjaro also supports the AUR. They are correct that you can certainly enable it and start installing packages from there.

I assume you are warning that, because Manjaro maintains its own base repos and has different package versions in it than Arch does, that Manjaro is incompatible with the AUR and that using the AUR with Manjaro will cause problems. If that is what you are saying, I agree with you.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I never use flatpaks and am doing just fine. I don't want my packages to be installed from a bunch of different places; I want it all managed by one package manager, which for me is my distro package manager. I've never noticed a problem arising out of not using flatpaks; everything I want is either already packaged for me, or I can make a package myself.

[–] SexualPolytope 1 points 1 month ago

That's what I do. But then I mostly use Arch or Arch based distros (e.g. EndeavourOS). So I have access to AUR. If something isn't on AUR (very rare, but can happen), I just create the package for it and publish to AUR. I do use some AlmaLinux machines as server. I don't really need many programs outside of the standard repos there since I use them mostly for hosting Docker images. But if I do need to install something like that, I've some self-written LURE install scripts.

[–] FFF982@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Flatpak is supposed to "just work" everywhere.

[–] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It really only makes sense to me when your distro is older or doesn't have the software you want. I fully prefer native packages too, though, but I use Flatpak on phone.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Just use Nix. It can run all the packages on whatever platform. It has the largest repository of software & are some of the most up-to-date.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›