this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
100 points (95.5% liked)

PrepperIntel - Intelligence reports from preppers around the world

294 readers
18 users here now

Intelligence reports from preppers around the world.

1. What are you seeing that affects your prepping? Post should be based on something you're actually seeing / experiencing locally. If it is outside of your area / is speculation, prepare to have current and substantial evidence such as multiple and neutral links as to not have the content removed.

2. Post title must have a general description, location / region plus flair. We're not asking or wanting exact locations, just a general idea of where you're talking about in the beginning of the title. It greatly helps people read / filter posts.

3. If your post isn't from your own eyes but affects you, it is encouraged to have evidence. (Links) Recent and up to date links, benefit all and help others understand and contribute to your post.

4. Unconstructive comments may lead to removals or bans. We are here to gather intel, not hate. This includes personal attacks, name calling, pushing politics, religion, racism, sexism, condoning / avocation of violence, trolling, ill will towards others and so on.

5. If you feel that the intel is wrong, link your own recent and relevant intel on the direct subject. If you feel the need to argue back, calmly do so with recent and relevant evidence on the subject. We do not care who you are, or which side you're on, we seek truth and transparency through sheer informational evidence.

If your view isn't backed up, (and at this point likely causing an issue) it may be subject to removal.

User may have a chance to research and find intel to restore their comment after contacting a moderator... Don't make a habit of this.


OUTSIDE LEMMY SITES:

Overview of U.S. Freight

Rail traffic data

RSOE Map

Crisis Map

US fires map

Power outage map

Lightning map

Weather mapping

Weather mapping 2

Weather mapping 3

Red Cross Weather mapping

Food storage Calc

Outdoor Activity map

Disease related

Disease related 2

USGS info

Rivers Mapping

National Water Information System

Flight Map

Flight Map 2

Train Rail map

Live Rail Cams + recorded trains

Fixed internet map

Ham Radio Related

AmRRON

RepeaterBook

QRZ

HamStudy

HamRadioPrep

USRACES

RadioReference

State Taxes Map

Assistance

US Debt Clock

Live Fuel prices

Inflation Calc

Multi-use calculator

Basic Commodities Charting

Massive Open Source Collection of Stock Market Tools & Resources

EDUCATIONAL VIDEO CHANNELS: (Few favorites)

Food supply insights

Global Energy, Mining, Water & other

Economic Insights (often with a whiteboard)

Street level Economics insights

More economics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Definitely scary shit.

There are methods that can be used to alleviate the effects of audible offensive weapons, from placards used in protests to some solid shielding otherwise (makeshift riot shield), but for inaudible subsonic weapons, I only have theories based on the way RF works. In short, aluminum foil *should *work to protect from inaudible weapons like shown in the video. If the shield were to be made concave and faced towards its origin, it could end up focusing it back to where it came from as well. "Space blankets" should act as a shield as well without reflecting it back (instead dispersing it).

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago

The government caused panic. A peaceful demonstration turned chaotic because of the actions of the government. And who are the bad guys again? They always are.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago

More proof that guerrilla tactics are likely the only viable way to fight against an unethical state. Civilians are losing the technology battle.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 17 points 5 days ago

If this is a variant or evolution of ADS tech, you may be exactly backwards, OP.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System

Basically, its a microwave beam, that can be aimed broadly to make a crowd disperse by heating the top layer of their skin.

Some redditors are saying it may have been this.

If it is/was that, aluminum foil or space blankeys would heat up considerably more rapidly than exposed skin, and likely cause significant burns.

However, a redditor in that thread posted this:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=y0pYU1qNEQE

And this makes it seem more like it is a kind of directed sound weapon... which would be this:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-range_acoustic_device

If it is/was that... you'd have to have a phalanx of concave shields to attempt to scatter the sound, but the problem is that it is such high db that the sound would just bounce around off the ground and buildings... and you'd also have to know exactly where it was coming from, and somehow coordinate a whole crowd to do an aimed testudo formation... and account for 3 dimensions, not just two.

We're talking up to 160db, louder than being right next to a jet engine or rocket launch.

Your best bet would be basically gun range or flight deck or heavy industrial grade ear pro.

Both of these kinds of tech are usually mounted on cars or trucks... but nowadays, drone versions also exist.

[–] Inf_V@kbin.earth 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

can't believe I'm in the reality where conspiracy theorists were right about the government sending signals to hurt us

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

There are actually filed patents and research papers showing that a stationary subject, when hit with the right frequency and intensity of radio energy, will report hearing a sound 'coming from inside their head'.

To the best of my knowledge, no actual tech that does this is actually used practically as some kind of crowd dispersal weapon... but it is theoretically possible.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect

If you wanna fuck with someone, auditorily, easily, all you have to do is jerry rig a phone or some other device to basically emit the right kind of dog whistle.

If you consistently expose a human to a sound roughly between 20khz and 24khz... most people cannot consciously hear such a noise, as it is outside of many people's hearing range... but basically, you hear it subconsciously, and it will make you irritable, angry, lose focus, sometimes nauseous, paranoid.

[–] Set_Status_Online@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

That is absolutely terrifying.

[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If the shield were to be made concave and faced towards its origin, it could end up focusing it back to where it came from as well.

Isn't there a problem with subsonic audio in that it's really hard to determine the direction it's coming from? Although with a crowd big enough I suppose you could probably get a visual indicator of where the source is based off of people's reaction to it.

Edit: After watching the video I don't really think a person holding a shield would be able to reflect something that was able to clear a space as wide as a street. I'd also wager that the people welding such a weapon likely have the appropriate hearing protection to keep the system from effecting their selves.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I'm just going to leave this here

https://youtu.be/CXKTBQBugIA

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

If you're ever against one of these, hearing protection is important, but also get a parabolic shield to direct the waves back at your attackers, you can drive away the operators of it, keep advancing and take control of it.

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Would noise canceling headphones work against this?

[–] Disinformation_Bot@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Active noise canceling is usually just white noise. I'm not aware of any noise canceling device that actually measures and responds to a specific frequency, and even then, the headphones may not be able to physically produce the frequency they need to cancel. You need legit hearing protection that physically dampens the sound. These are not partocularly expensive; you can get basic protection for $20, and more comfortable sets can be found for about $40. Earmuffs for shooting should work well.

[–] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I saw a video of the attack. Wouldn’t sound absorbing material work like the cushion of a weapon case or sound absorbing foam?

Many people would need them in large squares, holding it above their heads or on different heights.

A problem that remains is that communication of the protest ceases because it would be absorbed. The sound absorbers would remain lowered until the sound wave attack happens.

[–] ryan_e3p@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No. Soundproofing foam doesn't do anything to protect you from it.

[–] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I saw a video of a guy experimenting against 2 types of audio weapon.

Some type of sheet plastic or smth worked at reflecting the beam.

Audio foam didn’t do anything