this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
493 points (98.6% liked)

politics

22255 readers
5109 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Dude should be saying we need our own tea party movement where we take over the Democrat party. Not that we need to fracture ourselves even more.

That said, I think there is an argument for independent runs in purely local politics in areas that only have Republicans run for things and have a hatred for Democrats they can't seem to move past.

Regardless. Bernie should know how our system works by now, he should know that fracturing has and will always be a stupid idea that only removes power from the leftists and progressives in the country and then gives it to the Republicans. Which then makes the Democrats move right because the progressives have left the building. This is just fucking stupid on a non local politics scale and Bernie should know better.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Dude should be saying we need our own tea party movement where we take over the Democrat party. Not that we need to fracture ourselves even more.

He already started it in 2016.

That said, I think there is an argument for independent runs in purely local politics in areas that only have Republicans run for things and have a hatred for Democrats they can’t seem to move past.

Yes. Or even run in the Republican primary (might be easier to get on the primary ballot than to get on the general election ballot).

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Started a Tea Party like movement? Or started saying we need one? Because he did not start one at all. If he had we would have Democrat voters coming out in primaries more, and kicking out establishment Dems more if they don't adhere to the parties core beliefs. He may have wanted to start one back then, but it was a false start because people lost a lot of steam when he wasn't the candidate. Sure there were a lot of progressives elected in the next midterm, but that should have been a continuing trend, instead of something that plateaus. The Left has lost steam with their movement because they don't keep their eye on the ball, we get distracted with infighting and splitting our votes with third parties instead of relentlessly pursuing our goal of remaking the party, something the Tea Party movement did extremely well at.

Dunno if running in the Republican primary would be worth anything because Republican primaries are very MAGA and if you aren't that then you won't get the nom at all.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Maga had to do that to capture the rnc...

We just pried the DNC out of the hands of neoliberals...

Which is why mainstream media is suddenly ok with criticizing the DNC.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I think most state parties are ok, and the DNC just got it's furtherest left chair in 30 years..

But the idea behind this, that politicians are loyal to voters over party is a lot better than where party comes first. Because helping voters is hard, and if it's not the priority it doesn't get done.

When we help voters when able, we have the numbers for majorities.

[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

he's only saying that because he happens to live in a super liberal small rural state.

know what happens in most ither states where you don't have name recognition or a party infrastructure behind you and you run for office? unless you have some sort of money reserve you can tap into and dollar bills come gushing out like an oil geyser, it's damn near impossible to not just win but get ballot access TO win. and if you do get ballot access, all you will do is steal votes from the registered democratic candidate (or the democratic candidate steals votes from you) and the republican wins.

a brilliant strategy from a man who twice ran for president as a democrat but refused to change his party affiliation. he didn't even take his own damn advice, and look at what that got us. just the fact that he didn't do this his own damn self should show how stupid an idea it actually is.

and by the way, sure he and aoc are drawing huge crowds. crowds are nothing. how many of those people vote? how many of those people get 2 more people to vote? just showing up to a rally means absolutely fuckall if you don't actually go vote and vote for viable candidates. because if your message resonates with the people enough you don't have to run unaffiliated with a major party because you would have the votes to run and win as a democratic candidate in the first place. because to be very honest, the thing that bernie is suggesting not only sounds like an exercise in liberal grifting, it also sounds like an excellent way to divide a voting bloc that when split has absolutely no chance of beating a republican ever but would absolutely lead to entrenched infighting among a group that should be united in beating republican christian nationalist fascism.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Well said. And poignant!

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I get what he's saying, but the history of third parties in the US says this is futile. Then again, the last thing the Democrats need right now is extensive party in-fighting when they should be united.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 days ago

Let’s remember the role givesomefucks played getting Donald Trump elected, and how much the folks like him talk shit about the New York Times because “billionaires” when it suits them.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Watch the video! It's why what Bernie (who I absolutely love as a senator) said won't work.

We can't do SHIT until we fix our voting system.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, then we're not doing shit. That's not going to happen at this point unless the system collapses completely, which you really don't want to happen.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

We're not going to fix it by voting third party, period.

The only way it can be fixed is to do it through changes led by our elected officials. So we need to advocate for and support people that can make it happen. We need to protest for it, push for it, put people in power that support it.

If someone doesn't support it, we need to exercise our votes together and get someone in there that's more progressive and will fight to make changes, not preserve the status quo.

But we can't lose sight of the drawbacks of our voting system while we work to see those changes implemented.

We can't get there by fracturing our vote into two less powerful groups/parties. They will win every time, because they're united.

We have to get people ready to exercise their vote for a united cause/person.

People like the person in this thread that folded like a napkin when starting to have a tough conversation are part of the problem - either we fix it together or we lose. If we just bitch about our problem and don't act, we lose.

Put your energy in getting the right person in power to support, and help them! That's the only way we're truthfully going to fix this.

load more comments