this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
531 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

69211 readers
4273 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 92 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

I mean... fine? France always does things kind of top-down and there's certainly no reason you have to have your phone readily available, and plenty of evidence it's good to be away from it.

It's not like they need to get to their phones to tell their parents there's an active shooter on campus. 😐

load more comments (14 replies)

We've had a similar ban in the Netherlands for a year or two now. Mobile phones were already not allowed in classes. Kids seem to have survived.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Good, you don't need smart phones in school

For anyone screeching that you do: No. You don't.

We've been without smart phones for millenia, literally, and we were fine without. You will be fine without.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we didnt have clean drinking water either, or daily showers, we lived without soap for millenia

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Lol, we definitely have had clean drinking water for far longer than we have had dirty drinking water, thank the industrial revolution for that. And try skipping a shower for a day - you'll be fine. Soap also has a long history https://www.soaphistory.net/soap-history/ over 4000 years

So literally wrong on all three points. Perhaps you need to read more instead of doom scrolling and swapping nudes on your smartphone

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm pretty sure there can be other bad stuff in water that existed before the industrial revolution

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"So literally wrong on all three points. Perhaps you need to read more instead of doom scrolling and swapping nudes on your smartphone" This made me feel like I was on reddit not lemmy lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago

We've been without a lot of things for millennia

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

For me school was a great way to learn almost nothing of any use while occupying 11 years of my life with pointless time filing busywork that I hated every hour, minute and each and every eternal second of of. The only thing worse than school has been work and my consolation is that at least it's not forever!

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

And yet here you are writing English.

You take what you've been given for granted.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] RecipeForHate1@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Brazil did it a while ago. Nobody died [yet]

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

Does anybody but me remember when schools banned walkmen? What about portable CD players? Gameboy? This happens everytime a new technology becomes popular and schools don't know how to regulate it they do this.

The downside is, a fair few student will have their phones confiscated by the school. But it won't dissuade them from bringing them in. You make them better at hiding them instead of creating tools and protocols to enforce for when they can and can't use them.

The crazy thing is, this should be about schools not wanting to be liable for or responsible for these pieces of tech. But Everytime I see legislation like this, it's to do with "children's mental health", or these devices being a distraction.

Model it. Nobody should be allowed to have a phone in schools by this metric. No phones for students? No phones for teachers and administration.

[–] rippersnapper@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah I think the adverse effect of handing an iPhone to a 10 year old in Atlanta, when that teen is still highly impressionable unrestricted and unsupervised access to the internet is far worse than handing a kid a Gameboy on which they can only game, or a Walkman on which the worst thing they can do is listen to Cardi B.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

Does anybody but me remember when schools banned walkmen? What about portable CD players? Gameboy?

Except none of these things were feeding Andrew Tate or Joe Rogan garbage straight into their highly impressionable skulls.

I, for one, support the banning of phones in schools. The social media addiction has been shown to cause depression, particularly in girls, and the brainwashing is ever more apparent.

If anything, this policy fails by not going far enough. I question whether kids should have access to social media at all before a certain age.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I remember when people didn't have phones on them 24/7 and kids didn't die and parents could call the school if they needed to talk to the kids. Somehow we survived.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And a bunch of people didn't but we don't talk about them, it was the norm back then.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Teddy sniffing glue, he was twelve years old, fell from the roof on East 2-9, Cathy was eleven when she pulled the plug, twenty six reds and a bottle of wine.

But people don't like that song, so you're right about not wanting to talk about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's funny is all the rich tech elite send their kids to schools that don't use tech to the same degree as public schools. Wonder why.

Probably because elite schools have smaller class sizes or teacher/student ratios thereby making it less necessary to have the ability to disseminate information via mass means with technology. Put it all up on a big screen where 30 kids can see it, send the assignments out to 120 kids via google classroom on school issued chromebooks (because there are plenty of kids from families that cannot afford computers), and do all the grading and review digitally. I’d be willing to bet those expensive private schools use plenty of tech, maybe kids carry Macbook Airs instead, but there’s no escape from tech in schools.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Because personal tutors are engaging directly with the student the whole session?

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I can't believe it wasn't like that since the beginning.
How is it not one of the many distracting things they would ban immediately?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

Good on you France!

I hope more countries start realizing how important this is. We have more than enough evidence demonstrating the damage that comes from being permanently connected, or even online for more than a couple hours per day, and minors are taking the worst of it because they are developing under those conditions.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Make school fun and not a prison and then kids don't need phones like their office worker parents do.

Doesn’t matter if the teacher is an absolute gem and knows how to captivate kids who want to learn. Most kids prefer the dopamine hit from social media and other phone usage compared to actually learning. It just ruins it for kids who actually want to learn.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I'm still not convinced that this is the answer to helping kids concentrate & learn more in school.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

there is no "the" answer but it can be part of an answer.

[–] Akrenion@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it is fine but we also need lessons to properly interact with the technology. Scams, fraud, disinformation and checking sources were handled very abstractly at best and archaic at worst.

Gen alpha is significantly worse than prior generations on tech. Them having their phones on them doesn't teach them, they consume on the lowest level. They don't learn the actual Internet skills prior generations had to to survive.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Good. Boredom is the key to learning. Well it should be interesting on it's own, but take what you got.

Of course the manner of learning in most schools is not ideal, kids find it boring for a reason, but without distraction they might latch onto some bits of information just to survive the class.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This mentality is why I almost failed higbschool. Boredom fails us who need to be constantly invested.

load more comments (1 replies)

Maybe if school wasn't 95% time filing garbage and busywork. I'd take a crashcourse video over what they served in school any day and hour of the week.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί