They rate Zionist propaganda websites such as UNWatch as credible so that really tells you all you need to know. Wikipedia also rejects MBFC as a reliable source. It is insane that anyone still uses that garbage website.

If you want a good laugh look at why MBFC rates "mondoweiss" as unreliable.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For example one of the source labeled as extremist was labeled like that by adl which defended musk when he did the nazi salute but compared thr Palestinian keffiyeh to the Nazi swastika.

You should you own research and determine by yourself what you find extremist or not

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And that's the first time I learned about the adf. As far as I know, they're nazi apologists

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What i meant is mediafactcheck labeled a source as extremist because adf labeled it like that. So even in mediafactcheck you should read sources articles and decide by yourself which source is not credible and post extremist views

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

Ey, good point! I did not look that deep!