this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3003 readers
1167 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought Musky boy wanted to SAVE the Earth from humans and that's why we need to go to Mars??

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

You misunderstood. He meant he called "savesies" on Earth, and now he has exclusive rights to use it for whatever he wants to do.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Land? They haven't had a successful flight sans explosion since Biden was president.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Legitimate question... Where else is the research and development going to be done? Launches are going to happen anyway, right now most rockets are just discarded as trash into the ocean along with any excess toxic chemicals in their production and use. Meanwhile the companies trying to change that paradigm and making things reusable, get vilified at every opportunity by the press, who never offer any sort of alternative ideas, just constant complaints to get advertising clicks nowadays

They're looking there because it's away from populated spaces. Guess what, most places away from populations are going to be in "protected" habitat. Because that's what we have left in many cases, especially anywhere near coastlines.

The entirety of the Space Launch infrastructure in Florida is located in a protected habitat, by design. It keeps risk to the human population low. Meanwhile everything around that habitat has been built up as much as it can be.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The alternative is somewhere that is not a critical wildlife refuge.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And where might that be anywhere near that general area?

They're not looking there specifically because it's a wildlife refuge. Everything else nearby is populated, which is why they're looking at the refuge.

They're not purposefully looking at having to deal with all this extra shit just because they wanna say "fuck you" to the birds, it's because that's the only viable location in the region.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

Then they shouldn't be launching if they don't have somewhere to land that doesn't fuck the planet we actually live on.