this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
21 points (88.9% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

873 readers
1 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30886747

Title kind of says it all but it's still baffling. Running an old ass amd fx with 24 gig ram in the other computer. Work laptop is an i7 with 64 gigs of ram and is still slower in daily use. Both have ssd boot drives.

Granted im comparing desktop and laptop. But a 15 year difference is pretty crazy to me.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 10 points 4 weeks ago

Work pc is probably being bogged down with remote management and antivirus junk

[–] Piatro@programming.dev 4 points 4 weeks ago

Recently had a look at graphics cards because I'm concerned about my 1080Ti dying at some point but you literally cannot find a better bang-for-buck card than this 9 year old relic (assuming you don't need 4k, which I don't). Never mind that newer cards also consume much more energy too. This is why campaigns like endof10.org are so important. We've all got perfectly good hardware, no need to throw it away just to line some scumbag corpo's pocket.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yes. Linux is that much better. We're trying to win over casual users and gamers, this year - but pure efficiency speed freak optimizers who switch are going to be very happily surprised by the difference. (A decent percent of that crowd make the switch years ago, of course. But it's still happy news to someone new, every day.)