this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
592 points (98.5% liked)

/0

1991 readers
15 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey m@tes, as y'all know, this instance has been anti-corporate GenAI positive since it's creation and as such we've typically allowed such content to be posted freely. However in the last few weeks we've had a bunch of drama from GenAI haters who insist on coming into our comms and starting slap-fights. This caused us to vote on a new rule to have the mandate to clear out this constant friction. This worked to an extent, but I think we can help foster a better community with the larger threadiverse.

One issue a lot of anti-GenAI people keep bringing is that while they can block dedicated comms like !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com, they don't have an easy option to avoid GenAI content in random other /0 comms as there's no way to filter it out. This kind of content has been seen to cause a lot of strife, because people complain about its existence, while /0 admins and mods based on the above rule, tend to sanction those complaining. This then causes drama loops with /c/YPTB and /c/FuckAI etc.

There is a good point to be made here that while we don't mind GenAI content in /0, there isn't a reason to not help others avoid it. So we want to institute the following soft rule by now:

Simply tag your posts which consist of primarily GenAI content with the [GenAI] tag in their title. Not only will frontends like Tesseract will natively parse this as a tag and display it accordingly, but people who dislike such content, can simply filter it out of their feeds. Eventually lemmy will add tags which will make this tagging more seamless, but for now a manual tag in the title will suffice.

This rule only applies to posts in non-explicit GenAI comms. The assumption is that people can simply block those comms completely anyway.

As I said, this is a soft rule for now. Soft in the sense that you're not going to be sanctioned for forgetting it, but we hope people will remind you to do so. This is a good-faith attempt by us to co-exist and help others avoid what they don't want to stumble onto, much like [NSFW] tags. So I hope you'll add do a good faith attempt to help us in this. Furthermore, people who come to posts tagged as GenAI explicitly to scold and start slap-fights, will give the admins and easier justification to clean up, since they could have just filtered out that content in the first place.

Cheers

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 6 days ago

Yeah, that's gonna age reeeal well.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 60 points 1 week ago

That's good I agree with this

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Good, AI art fucking sucks.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I know, those are my favorite use cases 😏

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like it. That's the thing about art. Some people like it. Some people don't. You don't get to define what is or isn't art for me. I get to define it for me. That's what's so awesome about it.

Also, get used to it. AI isn't ever ever going away. This is just the beginning. So pace your hate.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (10 children)

It's fine if people like it, it just gives me a gross and uncomfortable feeling when I see it and makes me sad that one of the first careers killed by AI could be illustrators.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think this is a good addition. We shouldn't alienate other like-minded people because of slight disagreements in my mind "minor shit" like this, and this seems like the least that can be done.

Also, I believe this post should be tagged with [GenAi] because of the attached image? 😅

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the tag is very much in the title yes ;)

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Re-reading it yeah it's in the middle, I'm just conditioned to think the format [TAG]:Title heh

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

Ye that's how most posts should look, but in my case I didn't want to add it twice

[–] whalebiologist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago

I like gen ai and I think this rule is a nice gesture towards the other side. It's a good practice to cite your sources when you're online anyhow.

[–] Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

FWIW, I approve/agree with this rule.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Imagine getting angry at something this trivial.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's more "imagine getting mad at people using it at all" because the social effects aren't trivial at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I mean...

I can imagine how artists struggling to make ends meet might be angry that work they'd spent years learning and honing their skills to produce was and is being crawled by tools made by a bunch of silver-spoon-chomping techbros who are marketing their products to businesses who employ artists as a way to employ less artists, and pay peanuts to those they do hire to wrangle prompts and fix AI mistakes instead of actually getting to make art.

And I can imagine how frustrating it is to see people minimize that struggle when it often benefits oligarchs and C-suite ghouls.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This isn't exactly a capitalist tech-bro instance. So while I agree with there being a problem here, the problem is less genai and more about capitalism IMHO.

Which is why it can seem a bit silly to me to go after this instance of all things when it comes to genai.

That said, as always, I think db0's soft rule is a really great good faith effort to be accommodating to others, while staying true to the core of what the instance is about.

So I hope you'll see that part of things and tone it down in kind.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Sorry, what exactly do I need to tone down?

Pretty sure this is the first time I've ever commented on the issue here or elsewhere on Lemmy.

I see anti-AI sentiment all over the fediverse, but nothing in the original post that would indicate that these users are exclusively targeting db0 communities, just that the admins here have chosen to address it; and I agree it's a good way to handle the situation.

I think there are good and valuable use cases for AI, including generative AI.

But I also think a lot of the costs are hidden because the tools are free and easy to access, and because those coats often pretty abstract and wide-ranging so as to be difficult to observe, quantify, and attribute to an emerging technology. So I think there are a lot of really valid reasons to question casual use of those tools because they do not exist outside of capitalism.

The point of my earlier post wasn't meant to be that all use of AI is bad or that somebody using it to make a meme or art of their big-titty anime waifu is directly putting artists out of work, but I also don't think that those things are entirely separable, either.

And since I was replying to a user whose comment made a blanket claim implying that casual use of generative AI is trivial, well... no, I don't think it is.

I've done all sorts of art in my life. Sometimes as a job. And it's personally pretty disheartening to see comments like "it just looks like AI, human-made art doesn't look like that" because yes, it sometimes does, even if the poster has never seen human-made art like that.

But I've also spent the last few years watching dozens of friends and former coworkers lose their careers and their livelihoods en masse for no reason other than naked greed.

I think that making art more accessible through AI can be a really cool and pretty liberating thing for a lot of people, but as it's being employed by the big corporate players, it does have big serious negative externalities for working artists and for cultural products writ large, and I think that's worth bringing up.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was wondering if you guys would catch the latest shitstorm on this. Definitely a necessary precaution. Its a good idea, and I hope it will be enough.

Its getting to the point where people are blanket terming us as unhinged and blocking the whole instance because debates are getting heated. :(

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The anti-ai people are sending death threats and transphobic remarks to mods.

They really need to step back and reassess their lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I got called an alt of db0 because I explained the instance's stance on Ai.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Kudos.

That's it, that's the comment

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's a good idea in spirit but the tags will mostly be used to brigade and not to filter in my opinion. Most apps dont even have the feature if I'm not mistaken.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they brigade, we'll handle it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

I already raised that concern as well, but I do think it's worth a try. Would be great to dupe the functionality of the NSFW tag for this purpose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I think this is a nice gesture but I also think it's way too charitable for the Anti-GenAI people currently complaining. Their issue isn't that they want to avoid it, they want to stamp it out, they want it gone. They're not going to hide posts or keywords, they're going to brigade them. They already brigade and harass explicitly GenAI communities and don't block them. They've harassed me multiple times, told me to die in DMs and even impersonated me for running such communities. Tagging isn't going to help, they're just going to use it to hunt down people who post it and brigade the posts or target the users, because they aren't angry that they are seeing it, they're angry that it exists and they wish to stamp it out, no matter the cost.

In short this is a good solution with good intentions but it assumes a level of good faith that just isn't there. I'd agree with this if the problem was really people just not wanting to see it, but the problem is much deeper. I'm sure that once people start doing it, the goal posts will be moved and they'll just stop using "untagged" as a reason for complaining.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Their issue isn’t that they want to avoid it, they want to stamp it out, they want it gone

Exactly this. These sorts of people don't want to co-exist. They want to bully us out of existence.

and even impersonated me for running such communities.

Sorry you've had to go through that. I have been through that too (and still have it happen). So I know how frustrating it is. People on Lemmy can be super weird.

I'm all for OP's solution, but like you, I don't it will solve much because of just how much people like to stir up drama. They won't use those tags to block, they'll use those tags to find and harrass.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I very much disagree. Insane people on the internet would not need a tag. If there is brigading - or if there is in fact a level of extremism as you suggest - tagging won't make a difference there. The instance is still too small and genAI is too popular around here to imagine that they need any help finding posts.

Tagging is a good faith effort to establish boundaries and maintain the good will of the fediverse toward this instance.

In short this is a good solution with good intentions but it assumes a level of good faith that just isn’t there.

I think - as is always the case with drama like this - there is plenty of good faith, it's just hard to see beneath the small but impactful amount of bad faith.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

This is a hopefully a happy middle group that stops these stupid fights and makes people focus on bigger things.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›