this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
144 points (98.0% liked)

Cyberpunk

1269 readers
12 users here now

What is Cyberpunk?

Cyberpunk is a science-fiction sub-genre dealing with the integration of society and technology in dystopian settings. Often referred to as “low-life and high tech,” Cyberpunk stories deal with outsiders (punks) who fight against the oppressors in society (usually mega corporations that control everything) via technological means (cyber). If the punks aren’t actively fighting against a megacorp, they’re still dealing with living in a world completely dependent on high technology.

Cyberpunk characteristics include:

Prefixes for posts

This is a community focused on cyberpunk as a genre of fiction. Please post any news articles about our real world slipping into a dystopian nightmare at: !aboringdystopia@lemmy.world


Icon created by @cloudless@feddit.uk | Banner generated via AI model


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was going to make a flippant post about a 12 year old Julia Stiles in the PBS show GhostWriter playing a hacker. Seriously, check it out. The clip is only 41 seconds long and it's so incredibly cringe.

But then re-watching the clip myself, it reminded me of how optimistic we were in the 90s about the future of the internet. There was a time when the internet was a new frontier. It was a way to find people with common interests, or have conversations with people on the other side of the planet. It was a way to share ideas without any boundaries. This could only be a benefit to humanity.

I remember seeing someone talking about Trouble and Her Friends and how the book was written from this optimistic perspective. It was written in 1994 (the same year as that Julia Stiles episode). The book takes this 1994 optimistic vision of the internet and extrapolates it out into a future world. And now, in hindsight, it just feels anachronistic. That future never happened. It's a world of ubiquitous internet and virtual reality, but the internet of Trouble and Her Friends has no commerce whatsoever. It was never monetized. And that just seems quaint now.

It reminds me also of the early 2000s internet where things had picked up but only young people and tech enthusiasts used it. "Old people" just didn't get it . I remember politicians trying to regulate the internet when they themselves had never used it and only had others briefly explain it to them.

There was a band at the time, Machinae Supremacy, who had a bunch of songs about internet culture and the politicians trying to stop them. Like their song Force Feedback:

This is the world you're in
And this is where ours begins
A borderless nation of thoughts to replace
Your walled-in existence in space

Sure you already know
That your age was long ago
We augment reality online
And you hail from ancient times

Again, this protection of internet culture just feels quaint today. I don't know if internet users in the 90s and early 2000s could've predicted what would happen when everyone was online or when businesses realized there was a profit to be made online. Maybe they could never envision that future; or maybe they just didn't want to.

I guess I don't really have a point here. I just wanted to watch a silly clip from a tv show but ended up feeling nostalgic about the optimism we used to have for the internet, and for what could've been.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

I miss this internet so much, as usual capitalism ruins everything.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

I’m still optimistic about it. Sure, there’s plenty of shitty capitalist bullshit, but that’s no different than the real world. There’s always been, and always will be, places like Lemmy or Tumblr or Mastodon or whatever where you can mostly get away from that. Places where delightfully weird people get together to talk about whatever hobbies or interests they have.

No matter what Twitter or Facebook or Google do, they can’t take those away, and often they can’t even intrude upon them.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

I miss the techno-utopianism of the 90s. I think it was built on naivete - we had no idea how capitalism worked, and the absolute hunger investors have for new markets.

One of the original sins of that utopianism was saying everything should be free (as in have no cost). So many of our current problems stem from how we refused to pay for stuff. News is a great example:

  • journalists must be paid to do good work;
  • so "free" news sites get their money from nefarious sources.

To be fair, part of that was because we had a hard time figuring out how to charge users for stuff. Newspapers gave their content away because they didn't have the technical acumen to set up a reasonably billing service. But I digress.

When we pushed the techno-utopia, we kind of forgot that people need to eat, and we pushed pushed pushed the idea that services shouldn't have a cost. And here we are: real journalism is hard to come by, while agenda-based drek is the default.

[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

You made me feel old, calling Machinae Supremacy “a band at the time”.. I thought nah that can’t be right, that era wasn’t that long ago, surely? So I looked up when Overworld came out and it was 17 years ago. Oh.

I sorely miss that optimistic, anarchistic (and anarchic) old internet. But the older and more cynical I get, the more I have a deep-seated suspicion that the powers that be actively encouraged this early adopter hype-optimism, knowing they’d be able to lock us in to more exploitative forms later.

It’s a bit later in the timeline, but I also see that in the world of design language and HCI: the abrupt shift from skeuomorphic “Fruitger Aero” to soulless, flat “Material Design” encapsulates this feeling of being ensnared, of having the jail bars slam down shut behind you, in a more visual way.

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Late 30s, so optimism was part of my introduction to the internet

[–] Ithorian@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I still joke that the tubes are clogged when the internet is going slow. I-was-saying

[–] copandballtorture@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least in part, the early internet was only accessible to people who wanted to access it (nerds), so nerds controlled the online culture for a long time. The democratization and onlinization of everyone through things like memes and social media has lowered the standard of participation

[–] Hammerjack@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think this is part of it. There used to be a barrier to entry where in order to get on the internet you first had to figure out how to get on the internet. It meant most internet users had at least some level of skill to figure things out on their own (since they couldn't search the internet for an answer). Now, of course, you can buy a smartphone with facebook pre-installed and no extra effort at all.

[–] erik@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

If you're not familiar with it, Eternal September is a concept that directly relates to this.

lmao i can still hear ted stevens' voice

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

This piece was in my feed right near this thread, as it happens. Seems to be approaching the same issue from a different direction.

[–] Creddit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think there is a path forward where the internet and the content on it are sufficiently commoditized that the costs become trivial to average people, like the cost of running an LED at night, and so monied interests move into other areas like robotics and the internet begins to drift back toward the idealized vision mentioned in this post.

I doubt it will ever drift all the way back, but it is getting super cheap to run edge compute and store data on the cloud.

It's getting increasingly cheap to write code with LLMs too, and if that continues to evolve at the rate it's going then users are not going to feel locked into their big-name platform of choice anymore. Porting from Apple to Google to Microsoft to Amazon to Self-Hosted etc, will be a lower and lower bar with fewer and fewer barriers for the average user, making for a hint of that old wild frontier feeling online again.

[–] Hammerjack@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I hope you're right, and I'm sure there will always be corners of the internet that will feel like a true sharing of ideas without an insidious side pushing towards enshittification.

While I don't think the walled gardens of big tech companies will ever go away, I hope we can always keep small corners of the internet (like Lemmy) for ourselves.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll just add that the "series of tubes" comment was more fair than it's been made out to be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes

And for the layman, especially 20-years ago, the quote is relatable. I disagreed with his stance on net neutrality, but it wasn't a dumb thing to say.

And BTW, no that the GOP has trashed net neutrality, I have yet to see the dire effects we all talked about. What happened?

[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

There is a decent metaphor buried in there, yeah. Basically trying to get at the difference between broadcast (how TV and radio worked, which everyone was already familiar with) and how the internet works which is a “unicast” kind of thing