47
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Guitarist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Publish or perish.

[-] Fourth@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

Pretty wild to consider how it is. Serious implications.

[-] Pandalus@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Considering that this was written almost 10 years ago, it will only have gotten worse.

We can point this out and complain, but really I fail to see a solution unless there is a systematic change. For that to happen though, those at the top will have to give up on their acquired benefits, so I think it unlikely.

Maybe if grants would be handed out on a 'lottery' basis (grant applications should still be screened to prevent handing out to non-serious applications), this could be achieved?

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
47 points (98.0% liked)

Academia

763 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS