this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
748 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

71623 readers
3601 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unity May Never Win Back the Developers It Lost in Its Fee Debacle::Even though the company behind the wildly popular game engine walked back its controversial new fee policy, the damage is done.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] torpak@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

When you make your business dependent on a single supplier, that's a massive risk. I don't quite understand why many Managers don't grasp that concept. There are two solutions: build your own infrastructure or use something that's either publicly available (like open source software) or easily replaceable (like a library with a common interface that many others also implement in a way that would also solve your usecase).

If you don't do that, one day in the future your supplier will increase the cost until it's just below the cost of switching. If the cost of switching is more than you can afford at that point, you are screwed.

Cloud computing anyone?

[–] PhantomPhanatic@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's the trust thermocline again. When will companies learn to do more ground level research before pulling bullshit like this?

[–] KingPyrox@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes shrugs

[–] Mockrenocks@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you destroy good will you're likely not going to get it back in any situation.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Can be destroyed in an instant, but takes years to build.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago

I'd hope not. I hope the devs realize that its a gamble to put all your eggs in one basket

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unity could get them back if they fired their CEO, John Riticello

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep. No matter the CEO. The fact the even can do it means they'll probably try.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

We don't know if they can do it. They walked their plan back before it could be tested in court. There's a very good chance that what they were doing (particularly their changing the terms of an agreement without any action from the other parties) was illegal.

[–] Jamie@jamie.moe 2 points 2 years ago

Imagine if Microsoft did the same thing with Windows? Allowing software companies to just suddenly change the rules like that could be a terrible precedent. They would probably get hit with antitrust for like the 50th time since they opened their doors.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Once they cheat on you, you can’t trust them again.

[–] xia@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Trust is a very strong but brittle thing. Once broken it tends to shatter like glass. I'm sure this situation would feel like a sword of Damocles to anyone who has significant investment in the unity platform, and who would want to voluntarily walk into such a position now?

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Am not sure why anyone would stay with them at this point. Even if they have a huge project which is massively popular, they have every reason to move away from them since they wanted to apply those changes retroactively. Imagine if they came up with half a million in fees years after your project has stopped selling and you have invested money into new project or elsewhere. Sure, it might be illegal to do so, but good luck fighting them in court.

New projects I wouldn't even think twice. They backpedaled on this occasion but their goal is clear and there was no guarantee they won't try this kind of thing again which leads me to thinking it's only a matter of time when they will try more sneakily to squeeze changes in.

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I thought competition is supposed to be good?

Not like that I guess.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›