Buffalox

The article later goes on to talk about how he was convicted by a jury and sentenced to life by a judge.

Sorry, I skimmed the article earlier and missed that, but now I see it.

I know that, that's common knowledge.
But if the research shows anything that's statistically significant, it would show a level of benefit.
To say that it could as in hypothetically, implies the research didn't really show anything one way or the other.
You could say the same of homeopathic medicine. It could be a benefit, except nothing has ever shown it to be.
Personally I'm pretty sure owning a pet like a dog or a cat is indeed beneficial, so I find it disappointing if this is not shown in research.
I believe there has been studies made that show lower rate of heart conditions among pet owners. There is also a sort of consensus that it helps psychologically for instandce against depression.
So it's not a long stretch to think it "could" help brain functions in other ways too.
It's just disappointing that according to the headline, the study failed to show that. Which made me not care to read it.

It was so obviously stupid back then, that only people too young to remember don't know this.
Trump had no reason to tear up that agreement, he did it because it was an agreement Obama had made, and Trump was hellbent on reversing everything Obama did out of spite and nothing else.

This is physics 101, warm air can hold more water at the same relative humidity. When air is warmed it collects humidity, and when the humidity condenses to water, it cools, and the cascading effect is bigger proportionally to the increased level of water in the air.

Even I figured that out more than 10 years ago, without being a climate scientist, but based on basic physics.
And in my country, we've also been seeing it clearly for some years now, and most regions are expanding sewage systems to be able to handle it.

But of course climate change deniers probably couldn't figure such things out, and need it explained as you would to a child.

life sentence for plotting to attack FBI agents and seeking to incite a “civil war,” according to prosecutors.

???

Usually a sentence is not according to a prosecutor, but a court decision by a judge.
So which is it?

AA er kvalmende Kristent.

Det nærmest sammenlignelige er nok mindfulness.

Religion er overtro og en mental cancer, både for individ og samfund.
Jeg har kun foragt for folk der forsøger at bilde os ind at vi har brug for mere overtro.
Hvis menneskeheden var reelt rationel, ville vi have afskaffet religion for 100 år siden.

OK, except the post indicate building a new garage to get rid of the unused car.
Kind of overkill IMO.

Being mindless about anything has pretty similar results, I don't see the point of this?
Forget you have a car parked in your garage and it will get dirty over time.
Maybe not the best analogy, but if you don't give a shit, things tend to fall apart.