152

The majority then announced, with an opinion from Chief Justice John Roberts, that it was overthrowing the student loan forgiveness program, granting a request from six Republican state attorneys general on behalf of a loan servicer, the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, that did not want to be used as a plaintiff. Without MOHELA, the states did not have standing to bring the suit—they are not directly harmed.

Roberts and the majority weren’t going to be bothered by the fact that their plaintiff was an unwilling participant in this highly partisan scheme. "By law and function, MOHELA is an instrumentality of Missouri ... The [debt forgiveness] plan will cut MOHELA's revenues, impairing its efforts to aid Missouri college students,” Roberts wrote. “This acknowledged harm to MOHELA in the performance of its public function is necessarily a direct injury to Missouri itself."

Never mind that in oral arguments the state admitted that MOHELA wasn’t aiding Missouri college students because it hadn’t paid into that fund in 15 years, and “said in its own financial documents that it doesn’t plan to make any payments in the future.”

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LordR@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago

Even worse was the other case that was based on a gay person's marriage. Turns out he is/was not gay, already married, had a child and didn't know that his name was used for a case.

The US Supreme Court is judging made up cases now.

As a European I hope that everyone in the US will vote accordingly to at least try to bring back some semblance of rationality back.

[-] Laxaria@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

One of the challenges in overcoming the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is needing a sufficient leftist majority in both branches of Congress to pass legislation, and this majority needs to be large enough to overwhelm the more restrained members of that majority. If this ever actually happens, the revamp of the SCOTUS is an inevitability.

The grim reality is insofar as legislation goes, any law passed or executive action taken can be challenged legally and the SCOTUS seems very willing to grant cert in arbitrary and capricious manners to overturn the legislation (or past judicial decision). The only saving grace of this series of decisions lately is revoking the independent state legislature theory, but that doesn't really stop state governments from committing electoral fraud :/

Rationality isn't returning to the SCOTUS for a long time sadly.

[-] Briguy24@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Please vote everyone in the US. Most important thing you may do without having any notion.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's no way out of this without expanding the court right? There are no easy ways to get these lifetime appointments removed, are there?

Edit: actually I just read they are trying to impose supreme court term limits!

[-] HipHoboHarold@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only other option is to bust out the guillotine. Waiting for them to die naturally is gonna take too long, they clearly will never retire if their own free will, and no one in charge seems to care enough to do anything about their crimes.

So either we expand or revolt.

[-] ExecutiveStapler@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not true, another option besides just murdering them is to place term limits on the court. Link is a bill introduced by Ro Khanna that'd have the most senior judge replaced every 2 years. If there were enough dems in the House and Senate reforms would absolutely be possible.

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

term limits wont stop them enriching themselves as much as possible.

[-] HipHoboHarold@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

So while not as likely to happen, glad to see someone trying to do something about it

[-] Anna@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Are you calling for killing members of the Supreme Court?

[-] HipHoboHarold@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Less "calling for", and more so realizing that a lot of regimes in the world only got taken care of through people rising up. Sometimes violence has been needed, and that can be shown throughout this countries history.

[-] NotTheOnlyGamer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

So, yes, you are calling for a violent insurrection against a part of the government.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I was under the impression they could be impeached.

[-] chinpokomon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, but only for an impeachment offence. Even if there was unanimous consent for everyonebut the majority Justices, we're talking 300000000 to 5, that disagreed with a decision, the decision still stands and isn't an impeachable offense. So a Justice would have to do something egregious. Then impeachment would have to have a majority consent of the House and 2/3rds consent of the Senate, and the Senate would then have to make a motion to remove that Justice. So it isn't realistic that this would happen, especially with the razor thin margins of control in both chambers. Party politics would block the removal.

[-] Anna@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed, if things don’t go exactly my way, I want it changed until they do. Our opinion or no opinion at all! Right guys?

[-] Darnov@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Could also abolish SCOTUS. Maybe force it to not be a lifetime appointment and rather it be a rotating committee from lesser courts?

[-] Machinist3359@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Circuit judges elected every 16 years w/o term limits by a popular vote would probably strike a nice balance. The role requires expertise, which is only really established by years in the field. Also want to avoid the election cycle being too influential on decisions. Yet, there needs to be a democratic mechanism.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

United States Politics

6 readers
1 users here now

### Welcome to US Politics! This magazine primarily focuses on US Politics and world politics from the US perspective.

founded 1 year ago