Firefox
/c/firefox
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.
Rules
1. Adhere to the instance rules
2. Be kind to one another
3. Communicate in a civil manner
Reporting
If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.
Unfortunately, even OpenAI themselves took down their AI detection tool because it was too inaccurate. It's really, REALLY hard to detect AI writing with current technology, so any such addon would probably need to use a master list of articles that are manually flagged by human.
If you could detect AI authored stuff, couldn't you use that to train your LLM?
It could be used to create a reward model like what is done right now with RLHF.
Suspect it would operate more on the basis of a person confirming that the article is of reasonable quality & accuracy.
So not unlike editors selecting what to publish, what to reject & what to send back for improvements.
If good articles by AI get accepted & poor articles by people get rejected, there may still be impacts, but at face value it might be sufficient for us seeking to read stuff.
I think at some point we will have to introduce human confirmation from creator side.
I don't mind someone using chatgpt as a tool to write better articles, but most of internet is sensles bs.
It's not possible to create 100% reliable ML-generated content detection
Marxist-Leninists cant reliably detect content D:
I don't even know of any that are 75% reliable. It's a really hard problem.
wasn't openai's ai detector like 25% accurate? at that point its just random chance mostly
I know there's GPT Zero. I personally don't trust it at all, but you could still look into it
moar A .I.
Another thought: does it really matter if it's AI generated or not? As long as you can fact-check the content and the quality isn't horrible, I don't see why it matters if it's written by a real person or not