25
submitted 1 year ago by GamerKick@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

Colin Moriarty says he has seen proof of its authenticity and thinks it could be announced in August; several clues in recent days point to its existence.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zxyx9999@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

God. Can you imagine if it’s like the San Andreas remaster? People will riot

[-] enkonju@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm still amazed that they abandoned the remasters of their flagship series and just left them broken. I think I'll hold off on any Rockstar remasters for the foreseeable future, hopefully it's not a bad sign for GTA6.

[-] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Please let it be an expansion to RDR2

[-] rix501@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

We are truly living in the era of remasters and remakes. More an observation than judgement. There are many games I never played that this will allow me to play for the first time.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The one area I will concede on remakes/remasters being a good thing is if A) no support for backwards compatibility for current gen platforms and can’t be easily emulated B) the game runs like ass on its original platform.

Red dead redemption fulfills these criteria at least on PlayStation

[-] Paria_Stark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think for RDR1 we should take into account that a remake/remaster means the game being available on more platforms than just PS3/360, which is always a good thing.

[-] RxBrad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, the entire map is already there in RDR2.

[-] TheFunMachine@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 5 points 1 year ago

Most of it is, actually. We used to glitch out of bounds in RDO and wander Guarma and Mexico. Mexico is literally the RDR1 models for everything. It even had the ambient noise tracks for wild animals. It’ll take a good amount of work if they intend to get it to rdr2 quality, but it’s there nonetheless.

[-] RxBrad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Can any of us really say for sure if Mexico is real?

(Thanks. I stand corrected... I never made it that far in the map during the post-game.)

[-] CKOW@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Mexico was a made up area for the game

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I mean "Baja California"? That is clearly a made up name. Someone heard of California and thought they'd add a musical instrument or something in front! /s

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Probably much needed. I started with RDR2 and loved it so much I got a PS3 to play the first game. But it wasn't nearly as good and felt a lot more dated after being spoiled by RDR2.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I played RDR first, but still very late - after RDR2 had come and gone as a phenomenon. It's dated, mostly in how empty the world feels. It's a little disturbing in a liminal way, and yet nostalgic because I can remember other games from that era having similar limitations.

[-] Caligvla@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

If it's really true, I wonder if PC is in the cards. I've always heard stories about how hard it would be to port to PC or something, not sure if it was all bull or not, but it's high time for a port.

[-] Arsaille@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Does this reply count as a necro? Anyhow, I vaguely remember R* dedicating all of their resources to one game now instead of 2 after RDR2 was pushed out. I hope if they've outsourced this remaster, it stays well enough away from what happened to the GTA games.

[-] FinalFallacy@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Who keeps asking for old games to be remade every couple of years? I'd like new IP and games, not be sold repolished games that were once good but after a decade, lose their replayability.

[-] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Well with RDR1 it picks up where RDR2 ended. I can't remember most of the story but theres a lot in RDR2 that should make things clearer in RDR1. Plus, 1 wasn't done for computer and I don't have an Xbox.

I'd love to continure the story chronologically with RDR2 graphics and gameplay.

It's not like another damn GTAV.

[-] McBinary@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't understand it either. Once and done for me. I'll never play it again after finishing it.

[-] cityslicker343@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

How about a RDR2 remaster for ps5

[-] sarge@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I'd honestly pay for a 60fps patch.

[-] DrummyB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Unpopular opinion I’m sure, but RDR2 actually looks worse in 60fps.

It was literally designed to look cinematic -like a film- hence the lower frame rate and things like film grain being added, etc. It specifically notes in the settings that this was the artistic intent of the developers.

Not saying people couldn’t play it in 60fps if they felt like it, but every high-frame-rate mod I’ve seen of the game, it actually looks LESS realistic. And that was sort of the intention - realism.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
25 points (96.3% liked)

Games

31731 readers
1604 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS