58

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/6334964

X drops headlines from articles, as new report details its bleeding ad revenue::Elon Musk's X revamped its look to eliminate headlines on article links Wednesday, the same day that Reuters reported the platform has seen massive monthly...

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's definitely gonna help with reducing pipelines and misinformation 🥴

[-] umbraroze@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

I've been on social media for quite a long time, and I've noticed that people have one thing in common: people just like to read the headline and argue endlessly.

(See? I'm doing it right now: writing this part of the comment before reading the article!)

This raises the question: If there is no headlines any more, what's left?

An endless barrage of people grumbling about nonsense that isn't even tangentially related to anything? People given a new excuse to pretend the source wasn't posted in a debate? (...okay, so this is already what's happening at the birdsite, so I can see why Musk considers this just an aesthetic change.)

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, X’s app has a new look, as many users can no longer see a headline on articles posted on the platform. Instead, users see only a blurb at the top, and an image that can be clicked on. The change appeared to be rolling out in stages across different platforms. At last check Wednesday evening, headlines were stripped for many iOS and desktop users, but were apparently still showing up on the Android app.

Many users pointed out that the change is causing confusion, since many posts now lack context from a headline.

The change had been expected, with Musk tweeting in August: “This is coming from me directly. Will greatly improve the esthetics.”

Yes, Elon, in the same way as a library where all the books have blank covers "improves the esthetics [sic]."

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't act shocked. This exactly what the Saudis paid him to do.

[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

He had to give former Twitter shareholders that money and also put up $20 billion, though. He can afford to lose it but I can’t see how he’d profit from this, other than an ideological/power jerkoff.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
58 points (96.8% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2163 readers
177 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS