14
submitted 10 months ago by bahmanm@lemmy.ml to c/programming@lemmy.ml

I just stumbled upon a collection of bash completions which can be quite handy: https://github.com/perlpunk/shell-completions

I tried mojo, cpan and pip completions in a sandbox and they worked like a charm!

The only question I've got is, has anyone ever done a security audit of the repository? Anyone has taken the time to look at the code? I could try auditing but I'm not even sure what to look for.

I feel quite wary of letting an unknown source access to my bash session and what I type.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ordoviz@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

The mojo, cpan and pip bash scripts don't fail my test of "skimming over the source and looking for dangerous external commands like curl or rm" (good syntax highlighting is helpful here). They look like typical completion scripts. However, if your Linux distribution has a pip completion script in their repos, prefer that one.

[-] bahmanm@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Thanks. At least I've got a few clues to look for when auditing such code.

[-] m_randall@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Auditing is nothing more than reading the code. Give it a read and make sure you understand everything it’s doing.

This is a great lesson on trust as well. I can tell you I did an audit and it all looks good but does that really have any value?

[-] bahmanm@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Agree w/ you re trust.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
14 points (93.8% liked)

General Programming Discussion

7631 readers
1 users here now

A general programming discussion community.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please start discussions that spark conversation

Other communities

Systems

Functional Programming

Also related

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS