130
submitted 1 year ago by mp3@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Peanutbjelly@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 year ago

They always focus on real estate value. Who of that under 45 demographic lowest earners can afford anything but survival and renting? Why is there absolutely no mention of the failure of antitrust? Brand conglomerates jacking up priced for pure profit because what are people going to do, use local goods from shops that are gouged for their basic operation costs? I work at a small local place, and I'm pretty sure the owners are as tired and depressed as the staff right now. Working harder than ever, and losing more money than we make.

All we can ethically do is shout and cry and be noticed, but the last few decades show how much that has stopped the trend.

Something has to change or riots will be inevitable. Automation isn't going to go backwards, and it's absurd the working class hasn't seen any improvement in their lives by this point.

[-] Igotz80HDnImWinning@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

It’s Guillotime™️

[-] markev@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

Can't build wealth when half or more of the income goes towards rent or that 6% 1million mortgage.

Wealth disparity increasing, cost of housing increasing, GDP/capita decreasing, productivity decreasing. This is not the "The Great Reset" that I was envisioning after COVID19. I was dubious of course, but I really thought there's a chance of more progressive policies. But instead we just have the feds subsidizing electric vehicles tech.

[-] ivemadeamoostake@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Like duh. At a certain point, it's like, who are these articles even being written for??! That's probably a rhetorical question. It's just frustrating.

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I believe that number is gonna be very surprising when just using liquid + fixed assets net worth instead of income percentile.

[-] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I believe that is what they used...

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I mean just sort by net worth hold and grouping them, not grouping by income. ie., top 1% by net worth, top 20% by net worth. Cause some people don't have income but have a lot of net worth.

[-] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Ah! I see the distinction now. Yeah, it is odd they mixed and matched like that.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
130 points (99.2% liked)

Canada

7069 readers
241 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS