1644
submitted 9 months ago by ByroTriz@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I thought "whitelist" got cancelled for being racist? I distinctly remember being forced to rename everything to "IP Allowlist" and having to rename all my branches to "main" from "master". Jenkins is 3rd party software, so it still has slaves... 😂

[-] punkwalrus@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

It did, and I was also doing that in some of our software in a previous job. Other terms we had to stop using were black sheep, white washing, and even gorilla.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7dd3d/we-need-to-stop-saying-blacklist-and-whitelist

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

How much have you been drinking today, my friend?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ObtotheR@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't visit these sites if you paid me. Much less forced me to watch ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sygheil@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Just disable JS if you are going to read texts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I wonder which content blocker you're using, because with uBlock Origin (with a fairly aggressive config and custom blocklists) I do not get that "disable adblock" pop up.

Not like I'd visit this site at all, I just tried to see if I could create a uBO filter for you to remove the paywall.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

Read as giving them ad revenue allows them to write without doing sponsored articles

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Free speech doesn't mean a compelled audience.

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 7 points 9 months ago

Just because you can say it doesn't mean I have to listen.

[-] NabeGewell@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Reminds me of Microsoft's "1,000,000 PCs can't be wrong" or whatever it was when they started pushing windows 10 to 7 users

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

If you’re trying to get paid based one someone’s views or clicks, it’s not free.

[-] netchami@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Makes sense lol

[-] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

wow, the balls of the folk who came up with this 🤡

[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Free speech also entails how willingly you are to put that speech out there. If you want to cover it with a paywall of any sort, you are most welcome to do that. Keep in mind that free speech and its actions also have consequences. If your content is good enough, people might pay to see it. Free market and all that.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Free speech for corporations and advertisers. For users is the paywall as adblocker. For this screenshot, Memes is a better place.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 months ago

This might be a mildly infuriating moment

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1644 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

30690 readers
1864 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS