31

See Beehaw's Post to find out why

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LollerCorleone@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Servers defederating themselves from others with policies they don't agree with is pretty common, especially if those policies are considered problematic. But I don't know what to think about the fact I can't see Beehaw mods specifying any particular instances of issues stemmed from users of those two severs, and it seems like the only criteria for defederating was the size of those two servers.

But I guess they have the freedom to make whatever rules they want for their own sever.

[-] Frigorific@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From what I have read it was about the difficulty moderating such a large userbase which is perfectly reasonable. The great thing about Lemmy is that anyone who disagrees can start their own server and run it however they want.

[-] LollerCorleone@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I have no issues with how they choose to run their instance.

[-] kjr@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@LollerCorleone What I understood was that the moderation was difficult now, due not only to the size of the instances but also with the fact that almost all the people were new and the communities are not stable yet.
Since they have a quite high moderation standard, I guess that now, with few resources and a fast grow, it is difficult to keep it. And this standard is a commitment to the own community, people joint the instance because of it.
Another issue to take in account is that the moderation tools are not enough to handle with the problems of big and heterogeneous social networks. If I understood, in Lemmy and Kbin the only possibilities are to be federated or not, but not something in between like in Mastodon (the silence option).

@Shortcake

[-] negi@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

kbin.social will also be defederated from beehaw.org, sooner or later.
After all, it has open registration policy and many users too.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Reading their rationale, yes, I think there's a very good chance they'll defederate kbin.social as well, sooner or later, regardless of how moderation here works.

#justfediversethings I guess.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pasci_lei@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Are Beehaw some sort of gatekeepers? I mean if you don’t want any interaction outside of your own instance at all because you can’t handle it, why even create an instance on an federated network?

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

That’s the beauty of the Fediverse - everyone gets to make the rules for their own instance, and you choose the instance you want.

There will be widely federated instances, entirely private instances (I’m looking at one for our work intranet) and everything in between.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheYang@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

They advertise themselves as a safe space.

being safe and being open are somewhat detrimental to each other.
They choose to be less open, to be more safe.

Fine by me, but I'd expect them to turn into a LGBTQIA+ (is that the current one?) echo chamber before long.
And maybe I'll be wrong, and that'll be fine too.

[-] b00m@kbin.social 50 points 1 year ago

LGBTQIA+ (is that the current one?)

feeling edgy today are we

[-] VerifiablyMrWonka@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago

LGBTQIA+ (is that the current one?)

It's somewhat ironic that this is just the sort of statement that beehaw admins are fed up of moderating away.

[-] zalack@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Yeah I've definitely noticed a running set of themes in the posts that are most critical of this move and it's making me much more sympathetic to Beehaw's decision.

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Assholes don't like being told they're not invited to the party. And the reasons they're not invited are... Well, things start to get recursive at this point.

[-] gk99@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Funny to me that people like you always complain about "safe spaces" in the same breath that you make it clear you can't handle something as irrelevant to you as someone's sexuality. That's projecting fragility. These aren't "safe spaces," they're just only allowing decent people who don't flip their shit when they find out what two consenting adults want to do with their bodies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IncognitoErgoSum@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, honestly, this sounds like a good thing, because the system works. Isn't it kind of the point of the fediverse that if you don't like someone else's rules, you can do your own thing? They aren't beholden to your rules, and you aren't beholden to theirs either. That sounds to me like a great system where no one group of people or opinions can exert control over everyone else.

[-] scyrp@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

some of the first posts i see on kbin from other instances are about a major defederation lol. not ideal since this is happening when the fediverse is growing... but I suppose this is the intent behind the fediverse.

[-] minnieo@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

this comment about it is great: https://kbin.social/m/main@sh.itjust.works/t/22433/Beehaw-defederated-us#entry-comment-90015

"I think it's easy to take this personally but I think it's more about the moderation tools in Lemmy not being adequate at the moment so this is the best bandaid solution for now. We need to quickly put effort into developing better moderation tools like limiting other servers without fully defederating, limiting specific communities, forcing nsfw on communities/instances, proxying reports to origin servers so admins have better feedback on their instance user's bad behavior, and many other things if we want to prevent defederating like this from being the only option.

I think infighting about this decision and differing moderation styles instead of focusing together on moderation challenges and tooling deficiencies risks tearing the community / federation apart and is counterproductive to the goal of being better than reddit."

there will be growing pains.

[-] Frigorific@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

If you are a subreddit drama enjoyer this exact sort of thing only adds more appeal to the fediverse.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Nah, don't worry about it, beehaw's always been shit

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] SparkIT@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Uh.. that's unfortunate because many will just interpret it as federation being bad and will go back to reddit preaching against fedi.

That being said it could also be a reason for admins to have conversations about how to deal with these migrations and which moderation tools they need.

[-] tal@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Uh.. that's unfortunate because many will just interpret it as federation being bad

IRC networks sometimes split. That didn't mean that they didn't generally stay together. Just that there were several major networks and a some isolated servers.

Usenet, as far as I know, generally remained one network, but occasionally saw Usenet Death Penalties.

XMPP supports federation, but organization, like businesses, exist that choose to use isolated XMPP servers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] soratoyuki@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is honestly the only major issue I have with the Fediverse. Most of my Reddit/social media posts are related to three or so niche interests. My first Mastodon account was on the central hub for one interest that later defederated with the central hub for another interest. Not being able to interact with 1/3rd of the people I want to interact with just defeats the whole point of joining these kinds of platforms. Moderators just carving out a chunk of the Fediverse for their users is just unacceptable.

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Moderators just carving out a chunk of the Fediverse for their users is just unacceptable.

The Fediverse is made up of independent websites, and the people who operate those websites have freedom of association.

Full stop.

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Right, but how is it any different than half the users on a subreddit leaving and starting their own? People will always get together in groups and will always naturally begin to despise one another for whatever reason.

It sucks, but it’s just the way it is. If people don’t want to interact with one another, there’s no point in forcing them to do so.

[-] soratoyuki@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

It's different because if people leave and start a new subreddit, you can still visit, subscribe to, comment on, etc. that new subreddit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] millionsofplayers@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I personally don’t like this change because of how many people use the world instance but lemmy blew up less than a month ago

I would consider switching to kbin if they had an app

[-] DianaHasWings@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

There's a kbin app called "kmoon" in development.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cache_miss@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting. I support their right to make that decision and I'm glad that's an option in the Fediverse. I'm not sure I'd want to see that change happening if I were a member of their instance (I haven't spent enough time there to have an informed opinion about the alleged problems they cite in the post), but I suppose the strength of federation is that users can choose to move to another instance without necessarily losing access to Beehaw's content. I wonder how this will play out among their userbase?

[-] BobQuasit@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I'm a Beehaw member; also a kbin member, but I wasn't able to get on here until tonight because it had been so laggy a few days ago that I'd given kbin up as unusable. To answer your question, I don't like it but I do understand it. It sounds from what they've said that they basically had no choice; they were overwhelmed.

That said, I'm now VERY glad that I have a kbin account. I just re-created my subscription list (including magazines from both of the banned instances) here. I just hope kbin isn't going to ban them too?

And just in case anyone is wondering: I expect to keep using both Beehaw and kbin (and my other Fediverse accounts, for that matter; I'm on Mastodon, BookWyrm, and Paper.wf). It's nice to have a low-stress refuge like Beehaw sometimes But I want to be able to access the whole wide world when I choose, too!

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I just hope kbin isn't going to ban them too?

I think it's more likely that beehaw.org is going to defederate kbin.social as well

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

38 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago