1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by naut@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Maybe December? So we all take money out of banks, at least current month salary, and spend cash only. I think that is something that shouldn't be hard to do and it would show if we, the people, have any power left to make positive changes for the future or we can just surrender and eat bugs.

Edit:

If I’m trading my only true value, my time, then I want to have 100% control over it, not to depend if some bank would freeze my account and I lost 1/3 of my life irreversible.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

I suspect you have some unhinged notions about banks and/or the government and/or cashless transactions, but because you didn’t say why we should do this thing you suggest, I don’t know what specific unhinged notions you have.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

"eat bugs" is alt-right fear mongering, so yeah I'd back your unhinged notions theory.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Davel23@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I think you'd be better off pushing for a mental health awareness month...

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Why though? What's the benefit?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

One benefit would be people becoming more conscious of their spending, probably not OPs goal though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Why?

The majority of my expenses come out with direct deposit and can't be paid with cash even if I wanted to.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

Just notice how much you got and not spend anything besides the absolute necessary like cooking groceries (no sweets, etc.) and non-essential services like Netflix, going out, eating out.
No need to take money from the bank and risk a 3000€ pay check running around.

load more comments (4 replies)

Two questions:

  1. Eating bugs is not an abnormal human behavior, and it is not uncommon in cuisine across the world. So I don’t see how that’s a negative thing, inherently?

  2. How would using cash translate into a message of “people power”? You’re still paying the same amount of the same currency for the same product, just in a different form.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago
[-] TH1NKTHRICE@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago
[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Many cashiers would hate this idea. It would slow things down considerably. We’d run out of change all the time. Already I run into problems with people paying for an $8 purchase with a fucking hundred.

That’s a big NO to #CashAwarenessMonth from me.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Cashiers get paid the same no matter how many people they serve. The boss isn't going to shake your hand and tell you well done leave alone pay a bonus for getting x amount of people through the till per hour.

Your employer failing to put adequate change in the till isn't your problem. The next time someone pays for an $8 purchase with a hundred, chill out and enjoy the unscheduled break.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

It becomes my problem when people have to stand in line too long, and I have to help someone who would have been relaxed but is now in a lousy mood. As you can probably guess, dealing with an agitated customer is more difficult (and more draining) than dealing with a neutral one.

I’m not just pulling this out of my ass. I’ve been on when the Internet failed, we couldn’t take credit cards, and “CashAwarenessMonth” actually happened. Trust me, we were all very aware of what a clusterfuck it was.

The amount of cash put in the till is determined by corporate, and monitored as if lives depended on it. My manager (who is actually a decent guy) does not have the authority to change that number, and will likely get fired if he does.

Plus, carefully counting out change instead of just watching someone swipe a card isn’t much of a “break”.

This is a terrible idea. If you can’t make the point without shitting on the little guy, maybe the point shouldn’t be made. This “ideology at any cost” bullshit is what conservatives do. Progressives actually give a damn about people, remember?

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe I'm old-school, but every paycheck I take out a few hundred to act as my spending money. I mostly frequent small businesses and I know they prefer cash to avoid fees (and possibly taxes but that's none of my business). It also helps with budgeting.

[-] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Now you see, if you just said something like "I'm tired of banks creating money out of thin air and getting bailouts when they gamble and lose, so how about we show them they should value us more instead of ruining our economy like with the 2008 crash, because if we all pull our money out they have no money left, like if all people in the world stopped paying taxes for a year, or stopped believing in money, the governments would be incapable of detaining you or that people should not be afraid of governments, corporations and their employers, instead the above should be scared of the people" I would've been all in, but with the direction you took it, I think I'll pass. Oh wait.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What about my mortgage? What about my bills? I’m down to retake power, but is this how?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] miracleorange@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

Or you could just put your money in a credit union...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I found the mugger that thinks cashless is damaging their business! ^

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Credit card companies increased their fees in October. Did they do anything for merchants or cardholders to increase the quality of service a commensurate amount? No. They decided to increase their transaction fees due to greed alone.

You should spend cash, at least at merchants you like. If you pay $20 in cash, the recipient gets $20. If you pay by card the recipient gets significantly less.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
1 points (50.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43800 readers
1017 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS