[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 28 points 9 months ago

It's wild that a site with hundreds of millions of users, didn't invest into multiple-account deletion tools.
True start-up mentality, that one.

Just shows how our "critical" social media is really just some hasty tape and bubblegum behind the scenes to keep the front from falling apart.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, that's pretty much my take as well.

All the "but muh datas" pearl clutching is just annoying and frankly, ridiculous. If they wanted to mine us, they already would have. They're probably doing it as we speak. They didn't have to create a multi-million social network for it. A raspberry pi on someones desk would have sufficed. Fedi doesn't have any (/very much) privacy.

They're doing this to escape the wrath of EU privacy watchdogs. They were already fined for $1.3bn and more is coming. Running their Twitter killer on interoperable protocol is nice, because it's free and they get to point at W3C and say they're LIKE TOTALLY supporting data portability. Why would they "extend and extinguish" that? It's their alibi.

I don't like Meta. It's a shit company ran by shit people. I hope they burn in hell.
But I can't really get my panties in a twist about threads.net existing.

I'll get angry if they somehow figure out to push ads to my face.

But for now. Maybe I'll block it. Maybe I won't. We'll see.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 38 points 9 months ago

Why are they still in EU? Isn't it time to revoke their membership card and benefits?

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 27 points 9 months ago

Yeah, and as the article links, this is just not about media, CDs, DVDs and games. It's also about very physical products that we immediately associate as "owned" - like printers, phones, cars, tractors or even, (lol) trains. They're all locked to manufacturers parts and repair services and increasingly difficult to circumvent.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

the shitpost level in this is glorious, but... maybe someone should start linuxmemes community for these no-content posts?

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

I created an issue about this while back - https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/225
Feel free to give it a nudge

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

Rich business dudes threatening other rich business dudes with... business.

There's not much "technology" in there.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

Yep this ^

The comment/article up/downvote functions combined with personal filters/ban/blacklist tools is all that's needed. Some kind of strange "karma" or global reputation over time is the detrimental to the site and discussions and encourages bandwagoning users.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

This is just it. Software is software. You can spin your own instance and moderate it as you wish. It's open source, so you can change and modify it.
But right now they're asking for donations to run their instance and help with their code.

So before you donate money and your time/expertise/code - it's probably a good idea to know who is asking for it. It's not entirely clear, to be honest.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's also these:
https://raddle.me/f/lobby/96713/heads-up-the-tankie-behind-lemmy-ml-got-banned-from-r
https://raddle.me/f/TankiesGonnaTank/89852/the-lemmy-ml-admin-is-banning-anyone-that-mentions-stalin-or
(google cache since the site is down) https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KNky1TdNscwJ:https://lemmy.pineapplemachine.com/post/5781&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=se&client=firefox-b-d

And I believe there's some allegations of them hosting the lemmygrad.ml instance, which is basically full on tankie home.

Basically, they don't think Uyghur genocide happened, they don't think Stalin did anything wrong and they love Xi.

And now they're asking for your money

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A lot of them go into business with venture capital, a great idea with future potential, but no idea how to monetize any of it.
Eventually the capital is starting to dry up and the owners will want return on their investments - so the company is forced to start turning profit. Enshittification of service at all costs follows. And then perhaps public IPO and the founders cashing out and buying yachts.

That's the lifecycle of a tech-startup

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

Exactly, props to Ars and Sharon for giving mods a voice in this. Really wish more news sites would do this, all I see is articles where Spez gets to control the narrative and tell his view on things (mostly, how wrong mods and users are).

view more: ‹ prev next ›

0xtero

joined 1 year ago