[-] Averrin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Because we are here because of content, made by users. I'm thinking about whole "lemmy-verse". If users encounter issues, they just stop using the service. You as an instance owner can choose to not participate. But if somebody already thinks rhat they helps, why not use it?

[-] Averrin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I dont suggest adding a centralization =) I see two possible and actionable directions:

  1. Create tech solution to balance load through available resources
  2. Spread the word that there are better ways to spend your money and passion helping lemmy. I know, my "engineering manager" bias tends to see process problems in places where are no problems. But I dont want to see how the awesome idea is dying because of lack of basic management and foreseeing.
[-] Averrin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'd like to help with this improvement. Do you know any plans for it? Honestly, looks like that there is no "lemmy committee" and even lemmy's developers cannot organize something like this. Any ideas?

[-] Averrin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's nothing about communities. Technically speaking, only the amount of direct HTTP requests matters. If nobody opens your domain, your instance is just spending your money for nothing.

[-] Averrin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I'm around 40lvl, just started Act 3. It's a diablo, as I wanted to see it. It lacks some qol features. And sometimes its a bit tedious (maybe it's just about me getting older). I played barb and necro on beta. Now my main is rogue and it's not an easy point'n'click. I want more skill buttons (at least 5th for ultimate), but it's interesting to test different builds. So, I'm totally happy with this diablo. Imo, it's better than diablo 3 in many aspects. But a little boring visually.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Averrin

joined 1 year ago