Starting this Stubsack off by linking to Pavel Samsonov's "You can't "AI-proof your career" with a project mindset", a follow-on to Iris Meredith's "Becoming an AI-proof software engineer" which goes further into how best to safeguard one's software career from the slop-bots.
BlueMonday1984
The first issue filed is called “Hello world does not compile” so you can tell it’s off to a good start.
The comments are a hoot, at least.
Found a quality sneer aimed at a vibe-coder sysadmin: https://nullrouted.space/2026/02/05/sysadmin-in-the-llm-age/
you completely skipped past one if not the most important theme in the novel which is language and the way people talk and write and the various ways they conduct themselves in different times and places
I don't think the LWer even realised those themes were there. This whole review screams "failed high school English" to me.
Found another website doing a good job keeping eye on the slop machines and their promoters: The AI Dirty List.
It also lists those who have fought against the bullshit fountains as well.
In other news, Larry Garfield of GarfieldTech has had enough of the bullshit fountains, and put out a fury-filled sneer in response.
New blogpost from Drew DeVault, titled "The cults of TDD and GenAI". As the title suggests, its drawing comparisons between how people go all-in on TDD (test-driven development) and how people go all-in on slop machines.
Its another post in the genre of "why did tech fall for AI so hard" that I've seen cropping up, in the same vein as mhoye's Mastodon thread and Iris Meredith's "The problem is culture".
One of the great tragedies of AI and science is that the proliferation of garbage papers and journals is creating pressure to return to more closed systems based on interpersonal connections and established prestige hierarchies that had only recently been opened up somewhat to greater diversity.
The whole thing's worth reading, but this snippet in particular deserves attention: