CTDummy

Yeah, the students that engage and rate the lectures, tutorials, etc aren’t cramming “everything” at 2am before exams and generally fare better in 2nd/3rd year when these strategies get less viable.

Anecdotally, they’re also less likely to get into embarrassing arguments with a lecturer who holds a PhD, because they’ve asked for the 15th time if a particular topic is going to be on the exam and pissed them off.

Pretty sure this account is just a repost bot that just posts slop.

Cheers for the comprehensive recommendations, I’ll check them out!

I was always a fan of Ray Ban and got their glasses/sunglasses. Guess I need to look elsewhere since this god awful partnership.

Honestly would just go hands off and tell the provider there’s water involved. They’ll likely need to repair and dig it up anyway.

About the name: “oomwoo” is a rotational ambigram — it reads the same flipped 180°, just like the robot itself roaming your floor in every direction.

State it clearly. None of your post have any flair and I checked on two separate clients.

Telling you that people won’t engage with lazy slop posting isn’t “policing” you, it’s telling you the reality of a situation you’re trying to lie to yourself is censorship. No one owes you engagement or a platform. Spellcheckers are entirely different to LLM. Only a slop poster would confuse or try to deliberately conflate the two.

Sure do so, myself and a good portion of communities who view this level of use/laziness similarly will keep doing what’s been happening to that content thus far. Just don’t come whinging about it or trying to kid yourself it’s “censorship” when you get banned.

You post AI coded stuff asking people to test it to see if it’s “worth investing time in”, you don’t even type the text for those post. It’s not even a witch hunt, it’s blatantly obvious. No one wants to engage with someone who doesn’t appear to bother even typing out their own post. Why should people, put in any effort to engage with you or “your” content if you can’t even be bothered yourself?

You continually get negative feedback for this and then whinge that it’s “worse than reddit” because plenty on communities here don’t want it descending into chat agents talking to chat agents and try to frame it as “”censorship””. Grow up. You want meaningful engagement on your projects/posts, put in meaningful effort. If you can’t post text without running it through an LLM first you likely haven’t got anything meaningful to contribute anyway.

I’m not saying you are necessarily (I also find it unfortunate in terms of acronyms lol). I’m just saying how it comes off a certain way and why people may interpret it that way and may be engaging with it as such.

Just Asking Questions (JAQing off) is a thing, it’s a form of trolling where people who either already have a POV or aren’t really actually interested in answers engage in discussion, typically in bad faith.

For example if you ask “do you think COVID-19 was engineered…” (given the conspiracy theorism inherent in the topic) and someone replies with an answer (no) to which you think reply “yes but virus can be easily engineered and released” and every response contains some variant of “I’m just asking a question”. You can probably see how it fits a pattern.

Forcibly retiring the CEO would achieve nothing. Even if somehow, in some fantasy, there existed a CEO who would say “nah, I’ll turn down this boatload of cash from idiots trying to cash in on AI, who want to buy out our current and foreseeable future supply, for the sake of domestic consumers”. They’d be ejected from their companies by their respective boards/shareholders so fast they’d burn up in the upper atmosphere. Blame the people marketing these glorified text predictors as “artificial intelligence”.