[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The proper comment is here but I’ll quote. 

“In the future we are going to look back on seeing children use iPads that directly connect them to the most sophisticated engagement and manipulation algorithms ever as something as horrid as a child smoking a cigarette, or doing any other drug”

Are you aware of dark patterns? How’re they’re all through websites and games now? To the extent that AI now inadvertently writes websites to include because practically all data their trainings are polluted with them? Simply “educating” people out of what amounts to nearly hostile platforms and algorithms is ludicrous. I get a lot of the criticism for the bill I do. People try to pin this as people crying “think about children” and “just let parents work it out” are woefully misinformed and parent have been failing for decades now.

I also thinks it worth noting that the senators in opposition (and unsurprisingly now commenter) all seems to be using highly emotive language to criticise the bill. A lot of reducto ad absurdum going on as well (like 3 comments I’ve seen so far with “think of the children” nonsense). Frankly pretty telling.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 2 points 4 weeks ago

I see a lot of people parroting surface level points provided by those in opposition to the bill but little addressing it. Especially the “social credit” nonsense. As mentioned in the debate digital ID wouldn’t be the only means for these social media companies to verify users. Though I agree that how it’s been rushed through is inappropriate.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago

If you think that’s a solid argument or one based in logic, good news. You’d probably make for an ideal liberal senator.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 10 points 4 weeks ago

Call of duty lobbies mentioned in senate. What a time to be alive lmao

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I don’t see how the communist remark is relevant. Social media has proliferated largely unchecked. They are potentially damaging platforms, especially for younger people. That’s ignoring the rampant misinformation. I mean have a look at X and the “your body my choice” nonsense. I’m surprised people are genuinely advocating for the multimillion dollar corporations being in charge rather than our government.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yeah some of these groups figure out pretty quickly that lectures theatres, being packed full of students make for a great opportunity to spruik your group/event. Unfortunately they would also figure out that first year subjects also had fuller theatres and would often have friendlier/more agreeable lecturers. This was disruptive and delayed lecture before these sort of groups decided it was appropriate to yell out during other people speaking and interrupt others events. I’m surprised it’s taken this long to address.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Another of the recommendations advises “the University prohibit any student from addressing those present in a lecture, seminar or tutorial prior to the commencement of the lecture, seminar or tutorial on any subject matter. A breach of the prohibition may be considered misconduct.”

“We help thousands of students each year with casework and legal matters,” he said. “It’s entirely absurd to defund the SRC, this is muzzling us and any students dissatisfied with how the university is operating. “When clubs and societies want to advertise events, as per policy, they could get accused of misconduct for giving announcements.”

So don’t do it at lectures. I think this is straying towards heavy handed by USYD but this has been a problem at my institution too. It is absolutely inappropriate to interrupt tutorials/lectures with this stuff. SRC I couldn’t care less about but other political student groups, nah. Before the whole (recent) Palestine issue we’d have some communist (and one or two other) groups at our uni interrupt the start of lectures. Despite the fact the third time I witnessed it a large portion of the theatre was vocally complaining about it. Around the campus as long as you’re not yelling at people or being disruptive sure but anywhere that people are learning or studying, no thanks.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I appreciate that the outcome may not have been what was strictly desired. The French populace still get off their arse and do more than complain on social media while effectively doing three fifths of fuck all. More than what can be said about some others, especially those who are inclined to make brain devoid white flag jokes.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 87 points 1 month ago

More and more these days French disrespect feels like boomer shit. Look what the French did when the government came for their pensions. The industrial action within the transport sector alone.

I was visiting Paris during some of the aforementioned protest. They’re out and about (in numbers) and will gladly get out to protest when they feel it necessary. Plenty of other western countries could learn, a lot, from the French people.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 13 points 1 month ago

*Deported in 7 years but yeah no idea why this guy would have gotten a plea deal. Apparently it doesn’t count if they’re sex workers. Either that or geopolitics played a part.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 27 points 1 month ago

Welp, I said I wouldn’t be surprised if it happened but damn; how disappointing. Dark times ahead for the US and likely the rest of us I think. Would absolutely love to be wrong though.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Nah you’re full of shit. Jesus finally found one. This is an anchor comment for mods/admins. This new account is an alt for the one I’m replying to.

view more: next ›

CTDummy

joined 1 month ago