[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Doesn’t it make the most sense to blame our election system that makes people feel like they don’t have enough choice or the ability to express their actual preference in an election?

The Democratic Party is a product of this flawed system. You can make things a bit better, but at the end of the day, you have to have a party that is a coalition of disparate groups that choose a single person who has to win it all. So, a candidate that super excites and energizes one faction of the coalition is likely to be very unappealing to other factions. And most of the time you’re going to end up with someone who nobody is actually excited for. It would be great if Democrats had a preferential/ranked voting system for determining that one candidate, which allowed for many candidates, and for those candidates to stay in the race without the risk of cannibalizing others (e.g. having both Warren and Bernie wouldn’t detract from either one). However, even this isn’t determined centrally by the party, as each state gets to do voting the way they want to. So, it’s not an easy problem to solve.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Sorry, I was just attempting to make a joke, nothing more than that!

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

So you’re saying it’s his turn

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I’ve spent the past decade thinking “surely they won’t get worse than this” and they always do

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world -4 points 6 days ago

So, let’s just strengthen that outrage muscle then, huh?

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I bet you’re going to tell me you read it somewhere

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Fair enough! Not that I think it means Obama-McCain fits into the dumb-smart dichotomy.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I understand how it’s procedurally possible to do. But why would everyone accept having the delegates at the convention just vote for some random person that the people didn’t get to vote on themselves? People around here talk about how the 2016 primary was so undemocratic because they had stuff like superdelegates, but at the end of the day the process was actually pretty democratic, unlike choosing someone totally unrelated after the primaries.

To me, Harris is the only one you could just put in place and say this is still the ticket you voted for. Anyone else, I don’t know how you pull it off.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

The Republicans really got just what they wanted out of people like you with what they did in Congress with the border. There is a legit crisis down there now. And there was an agreed-to, bipartisan border bill ready to go, and at the last moment Trump said to tank it because it will reflect well on the Democrats. So they tanked it, leaving Biden’s executive branch with very limited options to do anything. So he is doing one of the crappy few things he can do, and people like you just pin it to Biden, which is just what Trump and the GOP hoped for.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I have wondered how it would be possible to change the ticket into anyone else but Harris at this late stage. There is no time to do a new set of primaries. Harris is at least the VP on the ticket and the person whose job it would be to step in for Biden anyway.

How could he just designate some random person and everyone who voted Biden just has to go with it?

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 156 points 2 months ago

*Because of one issue that Trump explicitly said he would do much much worse with

view more: ‹ prev next ›

CoggyMcFee

joined 1 year ago