DelightfullyDivisive

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
CCW

Came here to say this.

Well, maybe not exactly what you said, but similar...

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a rat study. Mildly interesting, but not remotely conclusive.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been scrolling through these trying to figure out if this applies to the paid version or just the free one. Have you tried it to see if the paid version actually pops up ads?

I think...$5,500 in 2005? Probably not relevant to today's prices. I would imagine the equipment has made things a bit safer and easier, which would probably ... Well I'm sure it wouldn't drop the price because who ever does that? But it probably kept it from rising too much.

Before you pick up a gun, you should definitely familiarize yourself with the four rules of gun safety. Just give them all a careful read, and spend a few minutes making sure you comprehend them. They are simple and obvious if you grow up around guns, but if you have never dealt with firearms they are the key to ensuring that you never have a gun go off when you don't intend it to.

  • Treat every gun as if it were loaded.
  • Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.
  • Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.
  • Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.

Here is a non-ai generated summary:

Absolutely nothing. It will look like the full moon does any other time of the year.

It was a suicide attempt. I'm not sure if it was successful or not. Last I read he was talking to a law enforcement officer while holding on to one of the cables.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No question that banning guns reduces all of those things. In Germany it also made it easier to round up Jews, homosexuals and other undesirables in the middle of the last century. I don't think that human nature has changed since then. Is civilian gun ownership the only thing preventing similar behavior in the US? Or is it irrelevant as I infer that you believe? I don't think that there is a definitive answer.

There is merit in many of the different points of view on the subject. Unfortunately, most arguments around gun ownership and bans are fear-based. That makes rational discussion very difficult. It also makes it easy to demonize people who don't agree with you.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I noticed that you aren't arguing with the "idiots" part. We have a lot more than a handful of those...

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I wish that was the case here (Michigan, USA). We have had two in recent memory.

What are your thoughts on firearms ownership in the US, given what has happened to our government lately? Do you see merit in the idea of civilian ownership of small arms in our current circumstances?

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Avi Loeb is a crank. He is not taken seriously by any real scientists. He decided to sell his scientific integrity years ago.

Based on my deep knowledge of the methamphetamine trade (which comes entirely from watching "Breaking Bad" ), I'm sure you're right.

 

I came across a post on Reddit where a commenter implied they were using non-prescription drugs to manage their ADHD when they couldn't get a stimulant prescription for whatever reason.

Nobody would name the drug(s) for fear of being banned. From context it seemed some people were talking about a stimulant, and others marijuana. What might the stimulant be? Meth? If so, how would you dose that, and would it actually work?

I'm just curious, not intending to try it myself. I can get a prescription easily enough, and I have no desire to put myself in legal jeopardy. I am wondering if the meth version of amphetamine would work better, about the same, or not as well, though. I don't know the effects first-hand, but if it's anything like cocaine (I was an adult in the late 80s when coke was more popular), it doesn't seem like it would be helpful.

 

This is one of the problems I have with accuracy. I tend to shoot low and left, but only after the first round. This video was helpful, as were others from the same shooting coach.

I usually carry a 632 UC, which is a revolver chambered in 32 H&R Magnum. It has very little recoil, so I can shoot a bit faster and more accurately. I'd really like to shoot my 9mm guns better (9mm is MUCH cheaper), but it has been a challenge. What put me on the road to improvement was an understanding that several different issues are in play on every shot.

This video talks about managing the trigger press. The other things that I struggle with are grip pressure (putting pressure in the right place instead of tiring out my hands after one box of ammo), and proper tension in my wrists (so the sights snap back on target without bouncing around).

The key for me has been to slow down. I find that if I concentrate more and take my time, I can do most of the things some of the time. Apparently, more focused practice is better. Who knew? 🙂

 

I do like Chris Baker's gun-nerd take on things. In this case, I was trying to figure out why my guns all seem to move around in my hands when I'm shooting, causing me to take extra time to re-aim after each shot. In contrast, most of the people in pistol-related videos have their sights snap right back on target.

This blog explains some of the mechanics of recoil with different designs.

 
 

I have an optic on my Shield Plus that I don't shoot as well as the sights on my S&W 632. At the range, that is.

I carry it anyway because I need reading glasses to see any detail within 2 yards or so. The red dot works whether I have glasses on or not. Even high-vis iron sights are really hard to pick up against a bright background.

Has anyone else with older eyeballs found that a red dot helps? If not, if suggest giving it a try.

 
 

I was a bit skeptical of this idea, but I actually bought a Smith & Wesson 632 UC. Now I think the author of this blog post and video is right.

I carry it loaded with 32 h&r mag. This has noticeably lighter recoil than a 38 special in such a small gun, but it's very manageable. More importantly, ballistics are comparable to a 38 special out of a snubby. At the range, the gun is actually fun to shoot when I load it with 32 Smith & Wesson longs. I also tried some 32 shorts in it, and recoil is like a 22: Virtually non-existent. 32 short is pretty hard to find, though, and the only brand that I found was Magtech. Unfortunately, Magtech has a reputation for having a high number of dud primers, which has been my experience.

The 32 longs have very light recoil in any case, so I've just been sticking with those at the range. I have also watched the price for all .32s drop noticeably in the past couple of months. It isn't cheap, but it's cheaper to shoot then a number of other calibers that were popular 25 years ago.

Finally, I picked up a couple of HKS speed loaders from Midway USA. They were less than 10 bucks each, and although it isn't nearly as fast as reloading a semi-auto, it is doable in two or three seconds. A speed strip takes more like 10 seconds for me. More to the point, a speed loader in this caliber doesn't make a ridiculously large bulge in my pocket.

2
New community for CCW (discuss.online)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online to c/newcommunities@lemmy.world
 

a.k.a. !ccw@discuss.online

I just created this group on a different server. Reasons why are in the sidebar & first post. Please stop by and share your thoughts!

2
My EDCs (discuss.online)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online to c/CCW@discuss.online
 

These are the two that I carry most often. Both are Smith & Wessons. I am still trying to get used to the optical sight on the Shield Plus, so I usually have the 632 UC on.

I carry AIWB at around 1:00 for either of them. I find it comfortable for all day, though the revolver is a bit more comfortable.

Holsters are a Philster "City Special" (for the revolver), and a Harry's Holsters "Shorty" for the 9mm. I replaced the grip on the 632 with an Altamont wood grip - the one it came with did not fit my hand well at all. The Shield Plus is wearing a Hogue grip sleeve because it also didn't fit my hand well. I have very large hands (more long than wide), so most good CCW guns need something to improve the grip for me.

 

There are other CCW forums on Lemmy, but none on discuss.online, which is a US-based Lemmy instance. Since the US has the most permissive concealed-carry laws for the largest number of people, it seemed like a better instance for a group like this than lemmy.world, which is hosted in the EU AFAIK.

I would really like this group to avoid politics-based argument. I'm happy to add links in the sidebar to groups that encourage this, though - please just contact me to add one. I don't want to be too specific about that that means, but if it gets too noisy or rude I'll ask people to take it to a more appropriate forum.

I'm a regular reader of the /r/CCW forum on reddit (liked in the sidebar). I created this one because:

  • I think we need a backup, in case Reddit shuts it down for any reason
  • Lemmy is a better experience, without a bunch of ads always in your face
  • There already were a couple of CCW groups on other instances, but nothing on the largest US-based instance (which is this one), so I know there is some interest in the subject here

I'll get things going with a couple of other posts shortly, and pimp this group in the appropriate places on Lemmy. I'm not sure about promoting it on reddit (I suspect that Reddit polices any Lemmy links) - I'll ask the /r/CCW mods what they're comfortable with, if anythting.

view more: next ›