[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

What's messed up is that, technically, we do. Originally, OpenDocument was the ISO standard document format. But then, baffling everyone, Microsoft got the ISO to also have .docx as an ISO standard. So now we have 2 competing document standards, the second of which is simply worse.

[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago

AV1 can do lossy video as well as lossless video.

[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago

So there's a tool called tar that creates an archive (a .tar file. Then theres a tool called zstd that can be used to compress files, including .tar files, which then becomes a .tar.zst file. And then you can encrypt your .tar.zst file using a tool called gpg, which would leave you with an encrypted, compressed .tar.zst.gpg archive.

Now, most people aren't doing everything in the terminal, so the process for most people would be pretty much the same as creating a ZIP archive.

[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 89 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is the kind of thing i think about all the time so i have a few.

  • Archive files: .tar.zst
    • Produces better compression ratios than the DEFLATE compression algorithm (used by .zip and gzip/.gz) and does so faster.
    • By separating the jobs of archiving (.tar), compressing (.zst), and (if you so choose) encrypting (.gpg), .tar.zst follows the Unix philosophy of "Make each program do one thing well.".
    • .tar.xz is also very good and seems more popular (probably since it was released 6 years earlier in 2009), but, when tuned to it's maximum compression level, .tar.zst can achieve a compression ratio pretty close to LZMA (used by .tar.xz and .7z) and do it faster^1.

      zstd and xz trade blows in their compression ratio. Recompressing all packages to zstd with our options yields a total ~0.8% increase in package size on all of our packages combined, but the decompression time for all packages saw a ~1300% speedup.

  • Image files: JPEG XL/.jxl
    • "Why JPEG XL"
    • Free and open format.
    • Can handle lossy images, lossless images, images with transparency, images with layers, and animated images, giving it the potential of being a universal image format.
    • Much better quality and compression efficiency than current lossy and lossless image formats (.jpeg, .png, .gif).
    • Produces much smaller files for lossless images than AVIF^2
    • Supports much larger resolutions than AVIF's 9-megapixel limit (important for lossless images).
    • Supports up to 24-bit color depth, much more than AVIF's 12-bit color depth limit (which, to be fair, is probably good enough).
  • Videos (Codec): AV1
    • Free and open format.
    • Much more efficient than x264 (used by .mp4) and VP9^3.
  • Documents: OpenDocument / ODF / .odt

    it’s already a NATO standard for documents Because the Microsoft Word ones (.doc, .docx) are unusable outside the Microsoft Office ecosystem. I feel outraged every time I need to edit .docx file because it breaks the layout easily. And some older .doc files cannot even work with Microsoft Word.

79
submitted 10 months ago by DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
113
submitted 10 months ago by DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml to c/unions@lemmy.ml
[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 33 points 10 months ago

The US's actions against Cuba are inhumane, illegal, and immoral. President Biden should follow Obama's footsteps and normalize relations with Cuba.

End the blockade. Remove Cuba from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. Close Guantánamo Bay.

¡Cuba sí, bloqueo no!

[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago
  1. The very little, basic telemetry Firefox collects can be easily disabled^1.
  2. What alternative do you suggest to Mozilla? Reject the $500M and blowup everything they've worked so hard for decades to build? I feel like users having to click, at most, a whole 5 times to change their search engine (if they want) isn't that big of a sacrifice to have a major privacy-oriented, non-profit player in the tech sphere.
[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 72 points 10 months ago

What in the world would an "uncensored" model even imply? And give me a break, private platforms choosing to not platform something/someone isn't "censorship", you don't have a right to another's platform. Mozilla has always been a principled organization and they have never pretended to be apathetic fence-sitters.

[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 27 points 10 months ago

I hate to be the one to say this, but Reddit has always had a major issue with reactionary, hivemind politics and it's only gotten worse over time. This isn't new by any means.

169
submitted 10 months ago by DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml to c/unions@lemmy.ml
[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

is this what you're referring to?

The U.S. National Labor Relations Board on Friday resurrected key elements of a policy it eliminated more than 50 years ago requiring businesses that commit labor law violations to bargain with unions without holding formal elections.

38
submitted 11 months ago by DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml to c/unions@lemmy.ml
304
submitted 11 months ago by DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 20 points 11 months ago

It's just irresponsible / dishonest for journalists to call her anything other than what she is: a fascist. It is a well-documented fact and something we need to be completely honest about.

177
submitted 11 months ago by DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Microsoft Paint is introducing support for both layers and transparency

200
submitted 11 months ago by DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/4975490

Unity has changed its pricing model, and game developers are pissed off

Unity has announced that starting on January 1st, 2024, it will implement a new pricing model that will charge developers based on how many times a game was installed.

[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Feels weird for them to frame this as if the protest has definitively finished and Reddit won. Reddit is bleeding users, many of whom will probably never return.

[-] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Google made $7 billion from YouTube in 2021^1, might I remind you by running ads on other peoples's content. Now of course Google does provide the platform for that content, but the point still remains.

Users and content creators are what make YouTube, not the other way around. Companies like Google need to careful not to let their pursuit of profit upset the good thing they have going for them.

view more: next ›

DigitalJacobin

joined 1 year ago