Docus
It’s not ‘inconvenience at best’. The vast majority of people won’t use a VPN, so it will be a loss of revenue. Even if you are willing to pay for a VPN (or daft enough to use a free one), it’s an inconvenience as using a VPN can have side effects, such as other things getting blocked unexpectedly, or cause websites to redirect you to the local version in the country of your VPN server.
How does that work? I thought these shells need to be fired before they are armed. If not, handling them seems very dangerous
Or how to pronounce it.
In addition to ordering directly from china not avoiding the tariffs: it may not even be possible. Some (smaller) companies simply won’t ship to USA anymore due to the hassle of having to deal with the admin.
Blocking the user is my preferred option
Why is the last few lines of these bot summaries always unrelated to the actual article? Fix that bot or use better news sources
It’s a warning, with the aim of getting them to comply with EU rules. Not a punishment to put them out of business. But repeat offenders can get repeat fines, up to 10% of global revenue (not profits) which is not a cost of business most companies can ignore.
Upvote for your efforts to share facts, but I really don’t need that many words to convince me that Trump is talking shit, again.
They really need to stop this shit of handing out peerages
Actually no, I haven’t seen any media coverage of protests in the US.
I’m no expert on this, but that reads like a one sided take on the issue-which is more political than financial, with many asset seizures in response to US embargo’s, condemned by UN, rather than the other way round